From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: gregor kowski <gregor.kowski@gmail.com>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCHv2] b43 add harware tkip
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:58:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908042358.15966.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83a869cd0908041454i474b0ee4hfb770c7c5166be7f@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 23:54:42 gregor kowski wrote:
> On 7/31/09, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 31 July 2009 23:04:17 gregor kowski wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> > It's mapped to 4, because you removed the old API support.
> >> > (I'm not sure whether we want to remove that support, yet. Gimme some
> >> > time
> >> > on it...)
> >> >
> >> Does the old API still useful ?
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure. Why do we remove it at all? It just avoids one single
> > if condition in your tkip patch, doesn't it?
> >
> because you ask it : "We should probably remove that new_kidx_api crap
> alltogether." [1] :)
<quote> probably </quote>
> There is really bugs in the current code.
You always talk about "bugs". What are these "bugs"? Is it just the wrong
max_nr_keys assignment? That's trivial to fix.
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 20:49 [RESEND] [PATCHv2] b43 add harware tkip gregor kowski
2009-07-28 16:08 ` Michael Buesch
2009-07-31 21:04 ` gregor kowski
2009-07-31 21:08 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-04 21:54 ` gregor kowski
2009-08-04 21:58 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2009-08-04 22:03 ` gregor kowski
2009-08-04 22:06 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-04 22:23 ` gregor kowski
2009-08-04 22:27 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-04 22:32 ` gregor kowski
2009-07-31 21:00 ` [RESEND] [PATCHv3] " gregor kowski
2009-07-31 21:20 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908042358.15966.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=gregor.kowski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).