From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:54220 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933130AbZHDV6R (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:58:17 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: gregor kowski Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCHv2] b43 add harware tkip Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:58:15 +0200 Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <83a869cd0907271349h248204at74cc1603419fc83b@mail.gmail.com> <200907312308.31066.mb@bu3sch.de> <83a869cd0908041454i474b0ee4hfb770c7c5166be7f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <83a869cd0908041454i474b0ee4hfb770c7c5166be7f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200908042358.15966.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 04 August 2009 23:54:42 gregor kowski wrote: > On 7/31/09, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Friday 31 July 2009 23:04:17 gregor kowski wrote: > >> Hi Michael, > >> > >> > It's mapped to 4, because you removed the old API support. > >> > (I'm not sure whether we want to remove that support, yet. Gimme some > >> > time > >> > on it...) > >> > > >> Does the old API still useful ? > > > > Well, I'm not sure. Why do we remove it at all? It just avoids one single > > if condition in your tkip patch, doesn't it? > > > because you ask it : "We should probably remove that new_kidx_api crap > alltogether." [1] :) probably > There is really bugs in the current code. You always talk about "bugs". What are these "bugs"? Is it just the wrong max_nr_keys assignment? That's trivial to fix. -- Greetings, Michael.