From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:58540 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932416AbZHDWGD (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:06:03 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: gregor kowski Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCHv2] b43 add harware tkip Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:06:02 +0200 Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <83a869cd0907271349h248204at74cc1603419fc83b@mail.gmail.com> <200908042358.15966.mb@bu3sch.de> <83a869cd0908041503i74a7bd11uf85706aeaf95b611@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <83a869cd0908041503i74a7bd11uf85706aeaf95b611@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200908050006.02754.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 05 August 2009 00:03:11 gregor kowski wrote: > On 8/4/09, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 23:54:42 gregor kowski wrote: > >> On 7/31/09, Michael Buesch wrote: > >> > On Friday 31 July 2009 23:04:17 gregor kowski wrote: > >> >> Hi Michael, > > > >> There is really bugs in the current code. > > > > You always talk about "bugs". What are these "bugs"? Is it just the wrong > > max_nr_keys assignment? That's trivial to fix. > > > So [1] is ok ? Could you answer my question? -- Greetings, Michael.