Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: TH gets 5 GHz enabled as of new regulatory rules

["John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:46:29PM +0700, Phattanon Duangdara wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luis R.
> Rodriguez<lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > Note: this e-mail is in a public mailing list.
> >
> > Adding Michael and David. Michael, I'd appreciate your review on this,
> > if possible.
> >
> > Phattanon, thanks for your review of the TH document and sharing it
> > with us. Please see my reply inline below.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Phattanon Duangdara<sfalpha@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I corrected redgb from my knowledge.
> >
> > Did you see my patch? I corrected TH to be:
> >
> > country TH:
> >        (2402 - 2482 @ 20), (N/A, 20)
> >        (5170 - 5250 @ 20), (3, 17)
> >        (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (3, 20), DFS
> >        (5490 - 5710 @ 20), (3, 20), DFS
> >        (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (3, 30)
> >
> >> For 5150-5350 is for Indoor Use Only.
> >> Most of the regulartory
> >
> > What do you mean by that? Do you mean that the document refers to FCC
> > and ETSI/ITU standard for regulatory purposes for some items?
> >
> >> refer _either_ FCC or ETSI/ITU standard, so I
> >> guess that from the document 40MHz can also be used (same as US)
> >> because TH regulatory mostly cover all bandwidth on 40MHz.
> >
> > Are you saying the Thailand document refers to FCC for max allowed
> > bandwidth spacing and therefore US max bandwidth spacing should be
> > used (ie allow 40 MHz width channels)?
> 
> I am not sure about this. But if equipment that comply with FCC
> standard allow to use 40MHz, I think we can because, for example
> Translated rule for 2.4GHz says

<snip>

So, is the patch from Luis wrong?  If so, what is the correct patch?

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.
			¡Viva Honduras Libre!