Re: question about ieee80211_tx.c (fwd)

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:13:41AM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:50 +0800, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Julia Lawall<julia@diku.dk> wrote:
> > > The files ieee80211_tx.c in the directories
> > > drivers/staging/rtl8192su/ieee80211 and
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/ieee80211
> > > both contain the following code in the function
> > > ieee80211_query_protectionmode:
> > >
> > >       if (ieee->mode == IW_MODE_MASTER)
> > >                        goto NO_PROTECTION;
> > >
> > > Elsewhere in these files when there is a comparison against an
> > IW_MODE
> > > value, the field that is compared is iw_mode.  Should that be the
> > case
> > > here as well?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > julia
> > 
> > I don't know; rtl8192su & rtl8192e use a modified version of the
> > libipw stack, rather than the mac80211 stack found behind non-staging
> > drivers.
> 
> This is clearly a bug. The question is: who is maintaining this driver
> and why it doesn't use/extend ieee80211/libipw?

I maintain it, and I am working to convert it to use the existing
ieee80211 stack that is in the kernel.  Remember, these are drivers in
the staging tree, they are usually "crap" :)

thanks,

greg k-h