From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Hin-Tak Leung" <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] rtl8187: Implement rfkill support
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:03:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908241503.38020.herton@mandriva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A91F100.9040804@lwfinger.net>
Em Dom 23 Ago 2009, às 22:46:40, Larry Finger escreveu:
> Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > This change implements rfkill support for RTL8187B and RTL8187L devices,
> > using new cfg80211 rfkill API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
> > ---
>
> I found a problem with this patch. When I issue an 'rfkill block 1'
> command, I get the following circular locking warning:
Hmm, this is a issue that was already present before the rfkill patch, but
seems with it, it became more likely to happen. Please try this patch:
[PATCH] rtl8187: fix circular locking (rtl8187_stop/rtl8187_work)
Larry Finger reports following lockdep warning:
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.31-rc6-wl #201
-------------------------------------------------------
rfkill/30578 is trying to acquire lock:
(&(&priv->work)->work#2){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051215>]
__cancel_work_timer+0xd9/0x222
but task is already holding lock:
(&priv->conf_mutex#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa064a024>]
rtl8187_stop+0x31/0x364 [rtl8187]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&priv->conf_mutex#2){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffff81065957>] __lock_acquire+0x12d0/0x1614
[<ffffffff81065d54>] lock_acquire+0xb9/0xdd
[<ffffffff8127c32f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x56/0x2a8
[<ffffffffa064a392>] rtl8187_work+0x3b/0xf2 [rtl8187]
[<ffffffff81050758>] worker_thread+0x1fa/0x30a
[<ffffffff81054ca5>] kthread+0x8f/0x97
[<ffffffff8100cb7a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
-> #0 (&(&priv->work)->work#2){+.+...}:
[<ffffffff8106568c>] __lock_acquire+0x1005/0x1614
[<ffffffff81065d54>] lock_acquire+0xb9/0xdd
[<ffffffff8105124e>] __cancel_work_timer+0x112/0x222
[<ffffffff8105136b>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffffa064a33f>] rtl8187_stop+0x34c/0x364 [rtl8187]
[<ffffffffa0242866>] ieee80211_stop_device+0x29/0x61 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0239194>] ieee80211_stop+0x476/0x530 [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8120ce15>] dev_close+0x8a/0xac
[<ffffffffa01d9fa7>] cfg80211_rfkill_set_block+0x4a/0x7a [cfg80211]
[<ffffffffa01bf4f0>] rfkill_set_block+0x84/0xd9 [rfkill]
[<ffffffffa01bfc31>] rfkill_fop_write+0xda/0x124 [rfkill]
[<ffffffff810cf286>] vfs_write+0xae/0x14a
[<ffffffff810cf3e6>] sys_write+0x47/0x6e
[<ffffffff8100ba6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
The problem here is that rtl8187_stop, while helding priv->conf_mutex,
runs cancel_delayed_work_sync on an workqueue that runs rtl8187_work,
which also takes priv->conf_mutex lock. Move cancel_delayed_work_sync
out of rtl8187_stop priv->conf_mutex locking region.
Reported-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
---
drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8187_dev.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8187_dev.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8187_dev.c
index b6e9fbd..2017ccc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8187_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8187_dev.c
@@ -1018,9 +1018,10 @@ static void rtl8187_stop(struct ieee80211_hw *dev)
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
usb_kill_anchored_urbs(&priv->anchored);
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
+
if (!priv->is_rtl8187b)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&priv->work);
- mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
}
static int rtl8187_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *dev,
--
1.6.4.1
>
>
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.31-rc6-wl #201
> -------------------------------------------------------
> rfkill/30578 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&(&priv->work)->work#2){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051215>]
> __cancel_work_timer+0xd9/0x222
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&priv->conf_mutex#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa064a024>]
> rtl8187_stop+0x31/0x364 [rtl8187]
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&priv->conf_mutex#2){+.+.+.}:
> [<ffffffff81065957>] __lock_acquire+0x12d0/0x1614
> [<ffffffff81065d54>] lock_acquire+0xb9/0xdd
> [<ffffffff8127c32f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x56/0x2a8
> [<ffffffffa064a392>] rtl8187_work+0x3b/0xf2 [rtl8187]
> [<ffffffff81050758>] worker_thread+0x1fa/0x30a
> [<ffffffff81054ca5>] kthread+0x8f/0x97
> [<ffffffff8100cb7a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> -> #0 (&(&priv->work)->work#2){+.+...}:
> [<ffffffff8106568c>] __lock_acquire+0x1005/0x1614
> [<ffffffff81065d54>] lock_acquire+0xb9/0xdd
> [<ffffffff8105124e>] __cancel_work_timer+0x112/0x222
> [<ffffffff8105136b>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0xf
> [<ffffffffa064a33f>] rtl8187_stop+0x34c/0x364 [rtl8187]
> [<ffffffffa0242866>] ieee80211_stop_device+0x29/0x61 [mac80211]
> [<ffffffffa0239194>] ieee80211_stop+0x476/0x530 [mac80211]
> [<ffffffff8120ce15>] dev_close+0x8a/0xac
> [<ffffffffa01d9fa7>] cfg80211_rfkill_set_block+0x4a/0x7a [cfg80211]
> [<ffffffffa01bf4f0>] rfkill_set_block+0x84/0xd9 [rfkill]
> [<ffffffffa01bfc31>] rfkill_fop_write+0xda/0x124 [rfkill]
> [<ffffffff810cf286>] vfs_write+0xae/0x14a
> [<ffffffff810cf3e6>] sys_write+0x47/0x6e
> [<ffffffff8100ba6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> 4 locks held by rfkill/30578:
> #0: (rfkill_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa01bfbbc>]
> rfkill_fop_write+0x65/0x124 [rfkill]
> #1: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81215a60>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
> #2: (&rdev->devlist_mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa01d9f89>]
> cfg80211_rfkill_set_block+0x2c/0x7a [cfg80211]
> #3: (&priv->conf_mutex#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa064a024>]
> rtl8187_stop+0x31/0x364 [rtl8187]
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 30578, comm: rfkill Not tainted 2.6.31-rc6-wl #201
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff810641ec>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xc1/0xcc
> [<ffffffff8106568c>] __lock_acquire+0x1005/0x1614
> [<ffffffff81065d54>] lock_acquire+0xb9/0xdd
> [<ffffffff81051215>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0xd9/0x222
> [<ffffffff8105124e>] __cancel_work_timer+0x112/0x222
> [<ffffffff81051215>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0xd9/0x222
> [<ffffffff81063791>] ? mark_held_locks+0x4d/0x6b
> [<ffffffff8127db94>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
> [<ffffffff81063a04>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10b/0x12f
> [<ffffffff81063a35>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
> [<ffffffff8127db94>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
> [<ffffffffa00de2c4>] ? usb_kill_anchored_urbs+0x46/0x5c [usbcore]
> [<ffffffff8105136b>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0xf
> [<ffffffffa064a33f>] rtl8187_stop+0x34c/0x364 [rtl8187]
> [<ffffffffa0242866>] ieee80211_stop_device+0x29/0x61 [mac80211]
> [<ffffffffa0239194>] ieee80211_stop+0x476/0x530 [mac80211]
> [<ffffffffa0238d68>] ? ieee80211_stop+0x4a/0x530 [mac80211]
> [<ffffffff81044a28>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xcd
> [<ffffffff8127db65>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x2f/0x33
> [<ffffffff8121d116>] ? dev_deactivate+0x162/0x192
> [<ffffffff8120ce15>] dev_close+0x8a/0xac
> [<ffffffffa01d9fa7>] cfg80211_rfkill_set_block+0x4a/0x7a [cfg80211]
> [<ffffffffa01bf4f0>] rfkill_set_block+0x84/0xd9 [rfkill]
> [<ffffffffa01bfc31>] rfkill_fop_write+0xda/0x124 [rfkill]
> [<ffffffff8100ba9c>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
> [<ffffffff810cf286>] vfs_write+0xae/0x14a
> [<ffffffff810cf3e6>] sys_write+0x47/0x6e
> [<ffffffff8100ba6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1bf
>
>
> Larry
--
[]'s
Herton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-22 3:38 [RFC/RFT] rtl8187: Implement rfkill support Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-08-22 17:12 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-22 21:59 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-23 19:38 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-24 18:10 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-08-24 21:03 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-24 1:46 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-24 18:03 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski [this message]
2009-08-25 1:29 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-25 2:51 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-25 3:36 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-25 6:51 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-25 9:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 2:43 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-26 8:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 12:45 ` Larry Finger
2009-08-26 13:33 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-26 14:34 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 15:07 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-26 16:57 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-08-26 16:29 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-08-26 20:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-26 22:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-26 22:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 22:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-26 22:30 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-26 22:46 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908241503.38020.herton@mandriva.com.br \
--to=herton@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=htl10@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).