From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: fix print on warning on ath5k_hw_to_driver_rix()
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:29:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090826162941.GA4417@mosca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6c5339f0908260708l38208046o43330d9eda808b1e@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 07:08:55AM -0700, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez<lrodriguez@atheros.com>
> > First thing I saw upon a quick review was we were relying on our own
> > curband for RX instead of the cfg80211 hw->conf band. Now granted
> > that *may* be updated properly, and it seems that may be the case,
>
> Looks good at first glance, except it conflicts with changes I
> recently posted. I'm all for getting rid of driver copies of stuff
> in the stack.
I can rebase.
> > - /* NB: setup here so ath5k_rate_update is happy */
> > - if (test_bit(AR5K_MODE_11A, ah->ah_modes))
> > - ath5k_setcurmode(sc, AR5K_MODE_11A);
> > - else
> > - ath5k_setcurmode(sc, AR5K_MODE_11B);
> > -
>
> I take it ath5k_rate_update didn't really care?
Well I nuked ath5k_setcurmode() and didn't see anything relying on that
stuff.
> > ath5k_chan_set(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_channel *chan)
> > {
> > ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_RESET, "(%u MHz) -> (%u MHz)\n",
> > - sc->curchan->center_freq, chan->center_freq);
> > + sc->hw->conf.channel->center_freq, chan->center_freq);
>
> So, does hw->conf.channel change before we're told to change channel,
> or after?
Oh bummer, good thing you asked as I simply assumed it would be set *after*.
Turns out its done prior to the drv_config() call.
if (chan != local->hw.conf.channel ||
channel_type != local->hw.conf.channel_type) {
local->hw.conf.channel = chan;
local->hw.conf.channel_type = channel_type;
changed |= IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_CHANNEL;
}
...
if (changed && local->open_count) {
ret = drv_config(local, changed);
...
}
I suppose we can just remove that printk ? :)
> > - if (chan) {
> > - ath5k_hw_set_imr(ah, 0);
> > - ath5k_txq_cleanup(sc);
> > - ath5k_rx_stop(sc);
> > -
> > - sc->curchan = chan;
> > - sc->curband = &sc->sbands[chan->band];
> > - }
>
> Unless I missed something I think we still want:
>
> if (chan_change)
> ath5k_chan_set(...);
Not sure I follow. Let me explain the logic here a little better.
ath5k_reset() had a check to see if we switched channels. The check
is above, and I moved it ath5k_chan_set() called by the config callback.
Reason for this is channel change *only* occurs through the config callback
so we can be certain no other path will call reset with a channel change
request.
> > - ret = ath5k_hw_reset(ah, sc->opmode, sc->curchan, chan != NULL);
> > + ret = ath5k_hw_reset(ah, sc->opmode, chan, chan_change);
>
> There's just no synchronization of this stuff, not too surprising there
> are races.
config calls for reset seem to be with sc->lock. ath9k uses a mutex to
protect races between mac80211 callback calls, ath5k seems to use the
sc->lock *sometimes*, a good review of that may help but for channel
change this seems protected unless I missed something. Since channel
change goes through the config callback and since the callback protects
through sc->lock I can't see how we'd race against changing channels.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-25 18:25 [PATCH] ath5k: fix print on warning on ath5k_hw_to_driver_rix() Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-25 18:45 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-25 18:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-25 19:22 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-25 23:38 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-25 23:52 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-26 14:08 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-26 16:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2009-08-26 17:03 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-26 20:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090826162941.GA4417@mosca \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).