From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Gábor Stefanik" <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Mark Huijgen <mark@huijgen.tk>,
Broadcom Wireless <bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: Fix and update LP-PHY code
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:49:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908262249.52408.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69e28c910908261347u375f2f5cu74672b9f4b073738@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 22:47:12 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>:
> > On Wednesday 26 August 2009 20:51:25 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> >> -Fix a few nasty typos (b43_phy_* operations instead of b43_radio_*)
> >> in the channel tune routines.
> >> -Fix some typos & spec errors found by MMIO tracing.
> >> -Optimize b43_phy_write & b43_phy_mask/set/maskset to use
> >> only the minimal number of MMIO accesses. (Write is possible
> >> using a single 32-bit MMIO write, while set/mask/maskset can
> >> be done in 3 16-bit MMIOs).
> >
> > Why does it matter? PHY access is not done in any hotpath. So why
> > not prefer simple code over optimized code?
>
> This is how the MIPS/hybrid driver does it, I simply updated the code
> for parity.
I think _if_ we do it (I'm not sure if it's worth it), we should certainly
do it in a completely separate patch.
>
> >
> >> -Set the default channel back to 1, as the bug forcing us to use
> >> channel 7 is now fixed.
> >
> > And, everything in its own patch, please. I don't see a reason for
> > patching unrelated things in one big patch.
>
> Well, this patch is already in wireless-testing, so doing that would
When did I ack it?
Note that I _do_ have a life and I was not able to check mail for the past 9 hours.
So please give me an ack latency of one day, at least.
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-26 18:51 [PATCH v2] b43: LP-PHY: Fix and simplify Qdiv roundup Gábor Stefanik
2009-08-26 18:51 ` [PATCH] b43: Fix and update LP-PHY code Gábor Stefanik
2009-08-26 18:51 ` [PATCH] ssb: Implement PMU LDO control and use it in b43 Gábor Stefanik
2009-08-26 20:46 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-26 20:42 ` [PATCH] b43: Fix and update LP-PHY code Michael Buesch
2009-08-26 20:47 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-08-26 20:49 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2009-08-26 20:54 ` John W. Linville
2009-08-26 21:03 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908262249.52408.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mark@huijgen.tk \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).