From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: mac80211: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:13:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909111813.35810.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AAA75CB.6040803@hartkopp.net>
On Friday 11 September 2009 18:07:39 Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Friday 11 September 2009 16:57:54 Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> writes:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >> Hallo,
> >>
> >>> mac80211 (or some other part of the networking stack) triggers this
> >>> warning in the NOHZ code: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >>>
> >>> 08 seems to be NET_RX_SOFTIRQ.
> >>>
> >>> It happens, because my test driver b43 handles all RX and TX-status
> >>> callbacks in process context. I guess some part of the networking
> >>> stack expects RX to be in tasklet and/or softirq context.
> >>>
> >>> We also have a report of this warning in wl1251, so it's probably not
> >>> a b43 problem.
> >> Yes, I see this with wl1251. It uses workqueues everywhere.
> >>
> >
> > This patch seems to fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
> >
> > Index: wireless-testing/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/cfg.c 2009-08-09 18:47:11.000000000 +0200
> > +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/cfg.c 2009-09-11 16:59:12.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void ieee80211_send_layer2_update
> > skb->dev = sta->sdata->dev;
> > skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, sta->sdata->dev);
> > memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(skb->cb));
> > - netif_rx(skb);
> > + ieee80211_netif_rx(skb);
> > }
> >
> > static void sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> > Index: wireless-testing/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h 2009-08-23 00:06:41.000000000 +0200
> > +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h 2009-09-11 17:02:05.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -1053,6 +1053,14 @@ void ieee80211_tx_pending(unsigned long
> > int ieee80211_monitor_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
> > int ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
> >
> > +/* rx handling */
> > +static inline int ieee80211_netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + if (in_interrupt())
> > + return netif_rx(skb);
> > + return netif_rx_ni(skb);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> i know this NOHZ warning from the CAN stack also - but now, i know what caused
> this warning. I fixed it in my local tree and it works. Thanks!
>
> As there are several users in the kernel do exact this test and call the
> appropriate netif_rx() function, i would suggest to create a static inline
> function:
>
> static inline int netif_rx_ti(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (in_interrupt())
> return netif_rx(skb);
> return netif_rx_ni(skb);
> }
>
> ('ti' for test in_interrupt())
>
> in include/linux/netdevice.h
>
> What do you think about that?
Yeah, I'm fine with that.
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-11 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 14:48 mac80211: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Michael Buesch
2009-09-11 14:57 ` Kalle Valo
2009-09-11 15:07 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-11 16:07 ` Kalle Valo
2009-09-11 16:07 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-09-11 16:13 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2009-09-12 16:41 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-09-12 16:51 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-12 18:07 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-09-29 19:29 ` John W. Linville
2009-09-30 11:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-09-30 14:33 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-30 14:47 ` Kalle Valo
2009-09-30 14:54 ` Johannes Berg
2009-09-30 15:10 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-30 15:21 ` Johannes Berg
2009-09-30 17:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-09-30 18:18 ` [PATCH] net: fix " Oliver Hartkopp
2009-09-30 18:47 ` John W. Linville
2009-09-30 23:33 ` David Miller
2009-10-01 7:08 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-10-01 14:04 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-01 14:24 ` Kalle Valo
2009-10-01 18:42 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-01 19:10 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-01 19:26 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-01 19:32 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909111813.35810.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).