From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU"
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:34:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910072034.57511.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910071910.53907.elendil@planet.nl>
On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I've checked for 2.6.31.1 now and iwlagn is listed high there too when
> > the system is idle, but with normal values of 60-100 ms. And phy0 has
> > normal values of below 10 ms.
> > I've now rebooted with today's mainline git; phy0 now frequently shows
> > with values of around 100 ms too (i.e. higher than last time).
>
> Mike privately sent me a script to try to capture the latencies with
> perf, but the perf output does not show any high latencies at all. It
> looks as if we may have found a bug in latencytop here instead.
Not sure if it's relevant nor what it means, but I frequently see two lines
for iwlagn, e.g:
Scheduler: waiting for cpu 102.4 msec 99.7 %
. 3.3 msec 0.3 %
I get the same results with both latencytop 0.4 and 0.5.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 13:00 [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU" Frans Pop
2009-10-05 14:13 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-05 14:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-06 15:49 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-07 17:10 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-07 18:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-07 18:34 ` Frans Pop [this message]
2009-10-08 4:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 6:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 14:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 14:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 14:55 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08 15:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 18:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 20:34 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-10-09 3:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09 3:51 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-10-08 20:59 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-09 3:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09 6:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09 7:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09 7:55 ` Sedat Dilek
2009-10-09 8:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09 16:27 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-09 20:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 11:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:09 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08 13:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 14:15 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200910072034.57511.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).