From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48156
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758148AbZJIJSY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:18:24 -0400
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20091009.021820.62532131.davem@davemloft.net>
To: mb@bu3sch.de
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-10-08
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <200910091057.21269.mb@bu3sch.de>
References: <200910090108.08838.mb@bu3sch.de>
	<20091008.180119.242402327.davem@davemloft.net>
	<200910091057.21269.mb@bu3sch.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:57:19 +0200

> What's a maintainer good for, if it's not for maintaining the code
> quality?

It does not mean you get total control over anything, ever.

That's my main point.

Every maintainer who loses his mind when some change goes in he
doesn't like has a serious control problem.  And yes, sometimes that
includes me.