From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: kalle.valo@iki.fi
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com,
hidave.darkstar@gmail.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: fix ieee80211_rx() context
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:08:57 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091011.200857.141215452.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y6nhoqud.fsf@purkki.valot.fi>
From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:08:58 +0300
> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:
>
>>> > + local_bh_disable();
>>> > ieee80211_rx(dev->wl->hw, skb);
>>> > + local_bh_enable();
>>>
>>> This is a bit awkward from drivers' point of view, we have to add the
>>> same code to all mac80211 drivers using either SPI or SDIO buses.
>>>
>>> What about adding a new inline function ieee80211_rx_ni() which would
>>> disable bottom halves like above and call ieee80211_rx()? IMHO that's
>>> easier for the driver developers to understand and also easier to
>>> document ("use this function when calling from process context"). If
>>> this is acceptable, I can create a patch.
>>
>> I really don't see the point, since it's just three lines of code, but I
>> wouldn't mind all that much either.
>
> My worry are the developers who even don't know what is a bottom half
> and might get it all wrong. (Yes, there really are such people.)
And the difference between this and knowing you need to call the
ieee80211_rx_ni() thing is?
You have to know what the heck a bottom half is to even know that you
would need to call the ieee80211_rx_ni() thing.
And that's the same amount of knowledge necessary to simply wrap the
thing in a BH disable/enable sequence.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-12 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-11 10:19 [PATCH] b43: fix ieee80211_rx() context Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:26 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-11 10:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:35 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-12 7:27 ` Holger Schurig
2009-10-11 10:39 ` David Miller
2009-10-11 11:53 ` Dave Young
2009-10-11 15:59 ` Kalle Valo
2009-10-11 16:02 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 16:08 ` Kalle Valo
2009-10-12 3:08 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-10-12 7:49 ` Kalle Valo
2009-10-12 12:29 ` Luciano Coelho
2009-10-12 13:38 ` John W. Linville
2009-10-12 20:08 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091011.200857.141215452.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).