Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>]

On Thursday 05 November 2009 22:17:02 Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> On 11/05/09 22:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gertjan van Wingerde
> > <gwingerde@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/04/09 21:19, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> >>> <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is the rt2800 rewrite in the form of patches (I've trimmed cc:
> >>>> list considerably since I'm not sure whether most people really want
> >>>> to see 40+ patches in their mailboxes).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> There were some minor changes since yesterday:
> >>>>
> >>>> - two new patches were added at the top of tree fixing Kconfig help
> >>>>  entries of rt2800[pci,usb] drivers to be more helpful and to prevent
> >>>>  wasting people's time (I think that patch #1 should go to Linus'
> >>>>  tree as soon as possible, ditto for patch #2 and net-next tree)
> >>>>
> >>>> - patch descriptions were improved for many patches
> >>>>  (suggestion from Ingo)
> >>>>
> >>>> - rt2x00_intf_is_[pci,usb]() helpers for commonly used checks were
> >>>>  added to "rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces" patch
> >>>>  (suggestion from Ivo)
> >>>>
> >>>> - addition of separate rt2800 MAINTAINERS entry was dropped for now
> >>>>  because it stirred needless controversies distracting people from
> >>>>  technical issues (thanks to Julian Calaby for pointing this to me),
> >>>>  the goal of change was to make sure that people won't bother busy
> >>>>  rt2x00 maintainers about rt2800 tree so it is not a big deal anyway
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The rt2800 tree has also been updated to reflect those changes
> >>>> (old branch is still available as rt2800-v1 for reference):
> >>>>
> >>>> The following changes since commit fa867e7355a1bdcd9bf7d55ebe9296f5b9c4028a:
> >>>>  Juuso Oikarinen (1):
> >>>>        wl1271: Generalize command response reading
> >>>>
> >>>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>
> >>>>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/misc.git rt2800
> >>>>
> >>>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (41):
> >>>>      rt2800usb: make Kconfig help entry more helpful
> >>>>      rt2800pci: make Kconfig help entry more helpful
> >>>>      rt2800usb: fix rt2800usb_rfcsr_read()
> >>>>      rt2800pci: fix crypto in TX frame
> >>>>      rt2800pci: fix comment about register access
> >>>>      rt2800pci: fix comment about IV/EIV fields
> >>>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_read() comment
> >>>>      rt2800usb: use rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() to set key entries
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
> >>>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
> >>>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
> >>>>      rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev
> >>>>      rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
> >>>>      rt2800pci: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
> >>>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() arguments
> >>>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_regbusy_read() arguments
> >>>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00pci_register_multi[read,write]() arguments
> >>>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib.h
> >>>>      rt2800usb: fix comments in rt2800usb.h
> >>>>      rt2800usb: add RXINFO_DESC_SIZE definition
> >>>>      rt2800: fix duplication in header files
> >>>>      rt2800: fix comments in rt2800.h
> >>>>      rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces
> >>>>      rt2800: prepare for rt2800lib addition
> >>>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part one)
> >>>>      rt2x00: remove needless ifdefs from rt2x00leds.h
> >>>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part two)
> >>>>      rt2x00: move REGISTER_BUSY_* definitions to rt2x00.h
> >>>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part three)
> >>>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part four)
> >>>>
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Kconfig      |   16 +-
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Makefile     |    1 +
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h     | 1816 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c  | 1817 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h  |  134 +++
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c  | 1908 +++---------------------------
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h  | 1780 ----------------------------
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c  | 1828 ++---------------------------
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h  | 1818 +----------------------------
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00.h     |   43 +
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00leds.h |    4 -
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00pci.h  |   24 +-
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c  |    2 +-
> >>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.h  |   17 +-
> >>>>  14 files changed, 4048 insertions(+), 7160 deletions(-)
> >>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> >>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> >>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bart,
> >>>
> >>> Many thanks for these patches.
> >>>
> >>> So far I have been able to go through the first 30 patches of the
> >>> series. I'll finish the other 11 tomorrow (when I'm back home and have
> >>> better facilities to review these more elaborate patches of the
> >>> series).
> >>> They all look fine to me, I only had a comment for patch 10.
> >>>
> >>> I've sent my ACKs for the remaining 29 I reviewed.
> >>>
> >>> I guess Ivo still has to review them as well, as, so far, he has been
> >>> the one of the rt2x00 project to give the final ACK for inclusion,
> >>> unless he indicates that he is fine with my assessments.
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Gertjan
> >>> rt2x00 developer
> >>>
> >>
> >> OK. I have now completed my review of the remaining patches and have sent my ACKs for those.
> > 
> > A little summary would be nice for those who don't want to read single
> > line acks/nacks.
> > 
> 
> I'm sorry. In my mind the message was clear that I Acked all of the remaining patches in the series.
> Apparently not :-(
> 
> So, basically, from my side all patches have been acked, with the exception of path 10 of the series (which was only a minor issue).

Thanks a lot for quick reaction and review!

I've updated relevant patches w/ your and Ivo's ACKs.

I have also small process related suggestion: if possible please group ACKs
together into the reply for 00/ mail (like you just did now), this way there
is a higher chance that I will not lose some of ACKs or review comments.

Thanks.
-- 
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz