From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:47468 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756341AbZKFTaH (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:30:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:26:17 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Bob Copeland , linux-wireless , Vivek Natarajan , Vivek Natarajan , Jeffrey Baker , David Quan , Michael Green Subject: Re: Changing the way we handle region codes on Linux (public thread) Message-ID: <20091106192617.GF2782@tuxdriver.com> References: <43e72e890911060857l6e383578nc1c7d0f2ba63529f@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890911060945s3b00e056u1efe483bd88ebd30@mail.gmail.com> <20091106183833.GC2782@tuxdriver.com> <43e72e890911061120mc3f66cbl272adc273a39cb0c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <43e72e890911061120mc3f66cbl272adc273a39cb0c@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 11:20:34AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:38 AM, John W. Linville > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:45:29AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Bob Copeland wrote: > >> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > > >> >> I think that sums it up. > >> > > >> > I personally still like the idea of pushing the vendor-specific > >> > codes out to user space and having psuedo-country codes for > >> > those (e.g. "ATH_37").  Then the driver doesn't need all of the > >> > static rules loaded all the time and it would drop a lot of > >> > policy code from the driver.  CRDA could be enhanced to load > >> > multiple databases, one for pure iso-3166 codes, one with > >> > Atheros codes, one with Intel, etc. > > > > > > > >> But with that said -- I think the region-code scheme is overly complex > >> and am not sure if aiding it is something we should focus energy and > >> resources on. It would seem better to me to focus on more cleaner > >> solutions and leave that old stuff as legacy solutions. > > > > That's the thing about "legacy" stuff -- it doesn't go away just from > > ignoring it! > > True. > > > FWIW, I think Bob's suggestion makes a lot of sense. > > Patches welcomed then :) Haha...OK, I'll put it on my list... Lurkers are welcome to beat me to it! John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.