From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: James Grossmann <cctsurf@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Prism54/p54pci
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:14:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911062014.19363.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167ae39b0911061045i63b1650qa1573aa2427f9812@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 06 November 2009 19:45:53 James Grossmann wrote:
> Here's the iwconfig:
> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"newton"
> Mode:Managed Frequency:2.462 GHz Access Point: 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
> Bit Rate=48 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
> Power Management:off
> Link Quality=50/70 Signal level=-60 dBm
> Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
> Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
>
> I was unable to run the iperf as the client on the laptop
> (it hard locked the computer twice),
huu, that's really bad. especially, since a new release is around the corner.
Do you think you can catch the oops/bug report?
(switch to virtual terminal Alt-Ctrl-F1 and start iperf -c there)
> I ran it as server and received the
> following at a fair distance from the router (a couple of rooms, same
> as the iwconfig above)
> Client connecting to 192.168.1.3, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3] local 192.168.1.5 port 47866 connected with 192.168.1.3 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.4 sec 14.6 MBytes 11.7 Mbits/sec
>
> Same test across the room from the router:
> iperf -c 192.168.1.3
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to 192.168.1.3, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3] local 192.168.1.5 port 47867 connected with 192.168.1.3 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 21.4 MBytes 17.9 Mbits/sec
>
> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"newton"
> Mode:Managed Frequency:2.462 GHz Access Point: 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
> Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
> Power Management:off
> Link Quality=70/70 Signal level=-37 dBm
> Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
> Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
>
> Here's a little bit more I've been getting in my dmesg:
> [ 91.453279] wlan1: deauthenticating from 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx by local choice (reason=3)
> [ 91.453421] wlan1: direct probe to AP 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (try 1)
> [ 91.457825] wlan1: direct probe responded
> [ 91.457839] wlan1: authenticate with AP 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (try 1)
> [ 91.462748] wlan1: authenticated
> [ 91.462808] wlan1: associate with AP 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (try 1)
> [ 91.465574] wlan1: RX AssocResp from 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (capab=0x401
> status=0 aid=2)
> [ 91.465584] wlan1: associated
> [ 91.467208] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan1: link becomes ready
> [ 101.500094] wlan1: no IPv6 routers present
> [ 101.893294] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency
> of HW, fallback to performance governor
> [ 773.648180] wlan1: deauthenticated from 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (Reason: 7)
> [ 773.649900] wlan1: direct probe to AP 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (try 1)
> [ 773.654069] wlan1: direct probe responded
> [ 773.654082] wlan1: authenticate with AP 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (try 1)
> [ 773.655939] wlan1: deauthenticated from 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (Reason: 7)
Reason 7 => Class 3 (usually data frames) frame from non-assoc station.
Either, your STA timed out (due to lack of traffic?) or the AP lost
the connection state for some strange reason (reset?).
Regards,
Chr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-06 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 21:00 Prism54/p54pci James Grossmann
2009-10-08 16:28 ` Prism54/p54pci Larry Finger
2009-10-27 18:37 ` Prism54/p54pci Luis R. Rodriguez
[not found] ` <167ae39b0910310615k5475e5cp55d1c0d60e7a443b@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-31 13:26 ` Prism54/p54pci Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-31 14:11 ` Prism54/p54pci James Grossmann
2009-10-31 21:24 ` Prism54/p54pci Christian Lamparter
2009-11-02 5:07 ` Prism54/p54pci James Grossmann
[not found] ` <200911021611.37354.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
[not found] ` <167ae39b0911060900i2c8f4a78w4edecdcec36f1a38@mail.gmail.com>
2009-11-06 17:48 ` Prism54/p54pci Christian Lamparter
2009-11-06 18:45 ` Prism54/p54pci James Grossmann
2009-11-06 19:14 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2009-11-06 19:37 ` Prism54/p54pci James Grossmann
2009-11-06 20:33 ` Prism54/p54pci Christian Lamparter
2009-11-06 20:52 ` Prism54/p54pci James Grossmann
2009-11-06 21:45 ` Prism54/p54pci Christian Lamparter
2009-11-06 22:17 ` Prism54/p54pci James Grossmann
2009-11-12 16:17 ` Prism54/p54pci Christian Lamparter
2009-11-12 18:56 ` Prism54/p54pci Tim Gardner
2009-11-12 19:37 ` Prism54/p54pci Christian Lamparter
2009-11-12 19:45 ` Prism54/p54pci Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-11-12 19:54 ` Prism54/p54pci Tim Gardner
2009-11-13 1:49 ` Prism54/p54pci Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911062014.19363.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=cctsurf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).