Re: [PATCH 7/7] rt2x00: Update copyright statements.

[Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>]

On Sunday 08 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:25:58 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> > > index 5c7d74a..3207b83 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> > > @@ -3,7 +3,13 @@
> > >  
> > >  	Based on the original rt2800pci.c and rt2800usb.c:
> > >  
> > > -	  Copyright (C) 2004 - 2009 rt2x00 SourceForge Project
> > > +	  Copyright (C) 2009 Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
> > > +	  Copyright (C) 2009 Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com>
> > > +	  Copyright (C) 2009 Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
> > > +	  Copyright (C) 2009 Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>
> > > +	  Copyright (C) 2009 Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@gmx.de>
> > > +	  Copyright (C) 2009 Mark Asselstine <asselsm@gmail.com>
> > > +	  Copyright (C) 2009 Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
> > >  	  <http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com>
> > >  
> > >  	This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > 
> > If Bartlomiej has no objections, we could just update the statements for rt2800lib.c/rt2800lib.h
> > to something similar as rt2800.h:
> > 
> > /*
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com>
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@gmx.de>
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Mark Asselstine <asselsm@gmail.com>
> > 	Copyright (C) 2009 Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
> > 
> > 	This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > ....
> > 
> > because not sure if we need the seperate "based on" comment.. But I'll let Bartlomiej
> > decide on this one.
> 
> I think that the original version is correct and also documents new
> development direction well.

Ok, then the individual developers can move their copyright notice to above the
"based on" statements when new patches from them arrive.

Ivo