From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] rt2800: add eFuse EEPROM support code to rt2800lib
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:08:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911081908.23307.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911081834.51635.bzolnier@gmail.com>
On Sunday 08 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 08 November 2009 14:55:59 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: add eFuse EEPROM support code to rt2800lib
> > >
> > > eFuse EEPROM is used also by USB chips (i.e. RT3070)
> > > so move the needed code from rt2800pci to rt2800lib.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h | 2 +
> > > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c | 38 ++--------------------------
> > > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h | 29 ---------------------
> > > 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> > > @@ -147,44 +147,12 @@ static void rt2800pci_read_eeprom_pci(st
> > >
> > > static int rt2800pci_efuse_detect(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> > > {
> > > - u32 reg;
> > > -
> > > - rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, ®);
> > > -
> > > - return rt2x00_get_field32(reg, EFUSE_CTRL_PRESENT);
> > > + return rt2800_efuse_detect(rt2x00dev);
> > > }
> >
> > It would be better to fix all calls to rt2800pci_efuse_detect to use rt2800_efuse_detect
> > rather then adding a special wrapper function for it.
> >
> > > -static void rt2800pci_read_eeprom_efuse(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> > > +static inline void rt2800pci_read_eeprom_efuse(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> > > {
> > > - unsigned int i;
> > > -
> > > - for (i = 0; i < EEPROM_SIZE / sizeof(u16); i += 8)
> > > - rt2800pci_efuse_read(rt2x00dev, i);
> > > + rt2800_read_eeprom_efuse(rt2x00dev);
> > > }
> >
> > Same here.
>
> Could you please explain some more what do you mean by that?
> (Please note that we have an extra SOC handling in rt2800pci.c.)
Your changes made the following 2 functions:
int rt2800pci_efuse_detect(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
{
return rt2800_efuse_detect(rt2x00dev);
}
void rt2800pci_read_eeprom_efuse(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
{
rt2800_read_eeprom_efuse(rt2x00dev);
}
So why do we need rt2800pci_* versions in this case? They simply wrap
the rt2800 library function without providing anything extra...
Ivo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-08 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-08 13:38 [PATCH 1/9] rt2800: prepare for unification of EEPROM support code Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] rt2800: unify " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:19 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] rt2800pci: add missing RF values to rf_vals table Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:20 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] rt2800usb: reorganize code in rt2800usb_probe_hw_mode() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:52 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:20 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] rt2800: prepare for rt2800*_probe_hw_mode() unification Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:53 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:35 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 17:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:09 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] rt2800: unify rt2800*_probe_hw_mode() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:53 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:36 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] rt2800usb: fix RX descriptor naming Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:54 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:37 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] rt2800: add eFuse EEPROM support code to rt2800lib Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:55 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 17:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 18:08 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2009-11-08 18:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 18:27 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 18:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 18:40 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 18:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:14 ` Kalle Valo
2009-11-08 19:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:35 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 19:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 19:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 14:38 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] rt2800usb: add eFuse EEPROM support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:56 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:41 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] rt2800: prepare for unification of EEPROM support code Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:16 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 17:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:07 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911081908.23307.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).