linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] rt2800: add eFuse EEPROM support code to rt2800lib
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:35:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911082035.18197.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911082021.32455.bzolnier@gmail.com>

> > > > I think that they shouldn't have been added in the first place and I'll be
> > > > happy to add patch removing them to rt2800 tree (since code savings seem to
> > > > be really marginal and not worth the maintenance cost). 
> > > 
> > > Removing the ifdefs entirely would be fine.
> > 
> > Like I said before -- this would mean driver's behavior change.  Even though
> > WISOC code is currently dead (RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X are never set)
> > I prefer to not "overload" patches with logically different changes.
> > 
> > If you feel strongly about it please fix it in rt2x00 code and rt2800 tree
> > will deal with it, or alternatively please send me an incremental patch.
> 
> BTW the patch's impact is _320_ bytes increase of rt2800lib (on x86-64 so
> it is probably much less on the affected embedded architectures):
> 
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
> before:
>   16916	      0	      0	  16916	   4214	drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.o
> after:
>   17281	      0	      0	  17281	   4381	drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.o
> 
> for the _completely_ dead code (because embedded WISOC support is never
> enabled) that probably will be changed over anyway later during development.

As mentioned: Wisoc is not dead code, it is there for the platform devices with
integrated rt2800 chipsets. If you look at KConfig you can see the
RALINK_RT288X RALINK_RT305X are dependencies from configuration options...

> IOW something like this is completely not worth to be worried about
> and I would personally just skip it during review to not waste people's
> time needlessly..

Well dependencies from/on other drivers is something important...

Ivo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-08 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-08 13:38 [PATCH 1/9] rt2800: prepare for unification of EEPROM support code Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] rt2800: unify " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:51   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:19   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] rt2800pci: add missing RF values to rf_vals table Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:51   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:20   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] rt2800usb: reorganize code in rt2800usb_probe_hw_mode() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:52   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:20   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] rt2800: prepare for rt2800*_probe_hw_mode() unification Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:53   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:35   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 17:48     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:09       ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] rt2800: unify rt2800*_probe_hw_mode() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:53   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:36   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] rt2800usb: fix RX descriptor naming Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:54   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:37   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] rt2800: add eFuse EEPROM support code to rt2800lib Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:55   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 17:34     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 18:08       ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 18:13         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 18:27           ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 18:32             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 18:40               ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 18:47                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:14                   ` Kalle Valo
2009-11-08 19:21                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:35                     ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2009-11-08 19:38                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:25                   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 19:34                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 14:38   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] rt2800usb: add eFuse EEPROM support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 13:56   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:41   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] rt2800: prepare for unification of EEPROM support code Ivo van Doorn
2009-11-08 14:16 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-11-08 17:41   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-08 19:07     ` Gertjan van Wingerde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200911082035.18197.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
    --to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).