From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
Jouni Malinen <Jouni.Malinen@Atheros.com>,
Vasanth Thiagarajan <Vasanth.Thiagarajan@Atheros.com>,
Senthilkumar Balasubramanian
<Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@Atheros.com>,
Sujith Manoharan <Sujith.Manoharan@Atheros.com>
Subject: Re: signed vs unsigned bug in ath9k
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:20:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091208082031.GA29753@bicker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091207155542.GB19643@tux>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:55:42AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:07:36AM -0800, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> > 205 sta = ieee80211_find_sta(sc->hw, hdr->addr2);
> > 206 if (sta) {
> > 207 an = (struct ath_node *) sta->drv_priv;
> > 208 if (ds->ds_rxstat.rs_rssi != ATH9K_RSSI_BAD &&
> >
> > ds->ds_rxstat.rs_rssi is a signed 8 bit so it will never be == ATH9K_RSSI_BAD.
>
> ATH9K_RSSI_BAD is -128 and the minimum value for int8_t is -128 so why is it a bug?
>
It could be that someone fixed this already in the net tree? In mainline it's still
positive 128.
#define ATH9K_RSSI_BAD 0x80
regards,
dan carpenter
> > 209 !ds->ds_rxstat.rs_moreaggr)
> > 210 ATH_RSSI_LPF(an->last_rssi, ds->ds_rxstat.rs_rssi);
> > 211 last_rssi = an->last_rssi;
> > 212 }
> >
> > I would normally just change the declaration to unsigned but it looks like
> > someone may have chosen to have it signed on purpose.
>
> Yeah it comes from hardware.
>
> Luis
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091207110736.GA1338@bicker>
[not found] ` <20091207155542.GB19643@tux>
2009-12-08 8:20 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2009-12-08 14:42 ` signed vs unsigned bug in ath9k John W. Linville
2009-12-08 16:08 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091208082031.GA29753@bicker \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=Jouni.Malinen@Atheros.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@Atheros.com \
--cc=Sujith.Manoharan@Atheros.com \
--cc=Vasanth.Thiagarajan@Atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).