* [PATCH] libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code
@ 2009-12-18 10:36 Samuel Ortiz
2009-12-19 8:41 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2009-12-18 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, John W. Linville; +Cc: Dan Williams, Holger Schurig
There is no reason to signal a carrier off when doing a 802.11 scan.
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Cc: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
index c6a6c04..b0b1c78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
@@ -567,11 +567,8 @@ int lbs_scan_networks(struct lbs_private *priv, int full_scan)
chan_count = lbs_scan_create_channel_list(priv, chan_list);
netif_stop_queue(priv->dev);
- netif_carrier_off(priv->dev);
- if (priv->mesh_dev) {
+ if (priv->mesh_dev)
netif_stop_queue(priv->mesh_dev);
- netif_carrier_off(priv->mesh_dev);
- }
/* Prepare to continue an interrupted scan */
lbs_deb_scan("chan_count %d, scan_channel %d\n",
@@ -635,16 +632,13 @@ out2:
priv->scan_channel = 0;
out:
- if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) {
- netif_carrier_on(priv->dev);
- if (!priv->tx_pending_len)
- netif_wake_queue(priv->dev);
- }
- if (priv->mesh_dev && (priv->mesh_connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED)) {
- netif_carrier_on(priv->mesh_dev);
- if (!priv->tx_pending_len)
- netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev);
- }
+ if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED && !priv->tx_pending_len)
+ netif_wake_queue(priv->dev);
+
+ if (priv->mesh_dev && (priv->mesh_connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) &&
+ !priv->tx_pending_len)
+ netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev);
+
kfree(chan_list);
lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_SCAN, "ret %d", ret);
--
1.6.3.3
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code
2009-12-18 10:36 [PATCH] libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code Samuel Ortiz
@ 2009-12-19 8:41 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-28 1:41 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2009-12-19 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samuel Ortiz; +Cc: linux-wireless, John W. Linville, Holger Schurig
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 11:36 +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> There is no reason to signal a carrier off when doing a 802.11 scan.
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
> Cc: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
> index c6a6c04..b0b1c78 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
> @@ -567,11 +567,8 @@ int lbs_scan_networks(struct lbs_private *priv, int full_scan)
> chan_count = lbs_scan_create_channel_list(priv, chan_list);
>
> netif_stop_queue(priv->dev);
> - netif_carrier_off(priv->dev);
> - if (priv->mesh_dev) {
> + if (priv->mesh_dev)
> netif_stop_queue(priv->mesh_dev);
> - netif_carrier_off(priv->mesh_dev);
> - }
>
> /* Prepare to continue an interrupted scan */
> lbs_deb_scan("chan_count %d, scan_channel %d\n",
> @@ -635,16 +632,13 @@ out2:
> priv->scan_channel = 0;
>
> out:
> - if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) {
> - netif_carrier_on(priv->dev);
> - if (!priv->tx_pending_len)
> - netif_wake_queue(priv->dev);
> - }
> - if (priv->mesh_dev && (priv->mesh_connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED)) {
> - netif_carrier_on(priv->mesh_dev);
> - if (!priv->tx_pending_len)
> - netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev);
> - }
> + if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED && !priv->tx_pending_len)
> + netif_wake_queue(priv->dev);
> +
> + if (priv->mesh_dev && (priv->mesh_connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) &&
> + !priv->tx_pending_len)
> + netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev);
> +
> kfree(chan_list);
>
> lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_SCAN, "ret %d", ret);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code
2009-12-19 8:41 ` Dan Williams
@ 2009-12-28 1:41 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-01-07 6:25 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2009-12-28 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams, John W. Linville
Cc: Samuel Ortiz, linux-wireless, John W. Linville, Holger Schurig
Hi John,
> > There is no reason to signal a carrier off when doing a 802.11 scan.
> >
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
can we get this driver merged since no wireless driver should play with
carrier on/off settings during scanning.
I would actually go that far that we should fix it in 2.6.33 and also
backport it to -stable.
Regards
Marcel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code
2009-12-28 1:41 ` Marcel Holtmann
@ 2010-01-07 6:25 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2010-01-07 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Holtmann
Cc: John W. Linville, Samuel Ortiz, linux-wireless, Holger Schurig
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 17:41 -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> > > There is no reason to signal a carrier off when doing a 802.11 scan.
> > >
> > > Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
>
> can we get this driver merged since no wireless driver should play with
> carrier on/off settings during scanning.
>
> I would actually go that far that we should fix it in 2.6.33 and also
> backport it to -stable.
Well likewise even if it *did* play with carrier, nothing should be
listening to the carrier signal for wifi devices anyway. So it
shouldn't really be a problem.
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-07 6:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-18 10:36 [PATCH] libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code Samuel Ortiz
2009-12-19 8:41 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-28 1:41 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-01-07 6:25 ` Dan Williams
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).