linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <Sujith.Manoharan@Atheros.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Asus eeepc 1008HA suspend issue and mac80211 suspend corner case
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:07:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091223190704.GH2609@tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091223183351.GF2609@tux>

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:33:51AM -0800, Luis Rodriguez wrote:
> The issues are as follows:
> 
> 1) We stop TX and flush all packets out, and then call the driver stop().
>    Unfortunately there is a failed assumption that even ieee80211_xmit()
>    would not be called after stopping TX as __ieee80211_suspend() does
>    above.
> 2) Since ieee80211_xmit() is being called even after the driver stop()
>    callback it means mac80211 can potentially schedule work. Now the
>    new rework on the mac80211 workqueue pushes us to WARN when either
>    a driver or mac80211 tried to queue work onto the mac80211 workqueue
>    and we're suspended. A new patch from Johannes futher enhances this
>    to take into consideration resume so that we can allow drivers / mac80211
>    to queue work if we were suspended but now resuming. Even with these
>    checks in place I note that currently we do slip work through after
>    the driver stop() callback is called and before loacl->suspended is
>    set to true. So there seems to be a race here.
> 
> The first issue is not so clear to resolve as although we likely do prevent
> the networking core from calling ieee80211_subif_start_xmit() it doesn't
> mean ieee80211_xmit() internally will not be called by other parts of
> mac80211 and indeed I do believe this is what is happening. I'll try
> pin point the exact spot where this happens though, but I'll note though
> that checking for local->suspended will *not* work since we already know
> some work is being queued *and running!* and it wouldn't have if
> local->suspended was true already.

OK, not bad and pretty obvious too -- the issue is __ieee80211_suspend()
will tear down BA sessions and this does require xmit'ing. The only issue
then becomes that of trying to queue work after a driver stop(), that can
be fixed easily and will send a patch next.

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-23 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-22  2:23 Asus eeepc 1008HA suspend issue and mac80211 suspend corner case Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-22  4:39 ` Sujith
2009-12-22 15:50   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-22 16:20     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-22 16:55       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-22 17:59         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23  1:16           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23  2:52             ` Sujith
2009-12-23  2:54               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23  4:06                 ` Sujith
2009-12-23  4:00                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23  4:54                 ` Sujith
2009-12-23 18:33                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23 19:07                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2009-12-23  2:29           ` Sujith
2009-12-23  2:40             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23  3:47               ` Sujith
2009-12-23 16:25                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23  2:19         ` Sujith
2009-12-23  2:39           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-22 19:12 ` lspci CorrErr- UnsuppReq- changes (was: Asus eeepc 1008HA suspend issue and mac80211 suspend corner) case Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-22 19:30 ` mac80211 suspend corner case " Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23 12:08   ` Johannes Berg
2009-12-23 16:28     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23 16:47       ` Johannes Berg
2009-12-23 19:08         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-23 19:11           ` Johannes Berg
2009-12-23 19:19             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-12-24 12:43               ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091223190704.GH2609@tux \
    --to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
    --cc=Sujith.Manoharan@Atheros.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).