From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:58116 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752383Ab0ACWIJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:08:09 -0500 From: Michael Buesch To: =?utf-8?q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= Subject: Re: b43: acking patches Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 23:07:55 +0100 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201001032307.57327.mb@bu3sch.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 03 January 2010 22:30:27 Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Michael, you gave me some reviews of patches I was very glad to see. I > posted some (hopefully) corrected versions but didn't get your > response. > > Can we expect you ACKing patches as well? > > I post this question publicly as I may be not the only one person who > would like to know this. Well, no response means I'm OK with it (or that I don't care). In the past I used to ack all patches, but we changed that and I only reply if I see problems with patches. I usually respond within less than a day, if there's something I disagree with. -- Greetings, Michael.