linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] b43: N-PHY: add RSSI calculation for PHY rev < 3
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:23:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001112323.58399.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263248392.29743.13.camel@johannes.local>

On Monday 11 January 2010 23:19:52 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 23:13 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> 
> > No I don't think so.
> > It's C standard that uninitialized elements on automatic variables are
> > initialized
> > to zero, _if_ at least one element is initialized to something.
> > So if you init one element to 0, all others will be 0, too.
> 
> AFAIK, you don't even have to init anything, since otherwise not
> mentioned fields will be set to 0. Hence, just = {} is sufficient for
> arrays and will hopefully compile to the same code as an explicit
> memset().

Oh, nice. You are right, indeed. I didn't know that.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-11 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-10 22:13 [PATCH 3/6] b43: N-PHY: add RSSI calculation for PHY rev < 3 Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-10 22:38 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-11 21:13   ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-11 22:13     ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-11 22:19       ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-11 22:23         ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2010-01-11 22:27       ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-11 22:42         ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-11 22:43           ` Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201001112323.58399.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).