From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ath5k on 2.6.32 suddenly fails
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001152350.06930.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891001151447u39ad494ah6861926db0c50907@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 15 January 2010 23:47:00 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I wonder if a possible failure here might be that the box gets under
> load and some DMA allocation actually gives back less memory than what
> was requested., hrm, but even then we'd still tell hardware it has the
> whole desired length we intended...
>
> Not sure... I haven't reviewed this code in ages.
>
> > However, it had different failure symptoms this time.
> > Last time it failed, the AP was completely dead. No beacons, etc..
> > This time it was still beaconing, but auth failed:
>
> Can you reproduce? Do you know if anything particular happened at this time?
No, there was nothing special happening. I was just sending the previous mail
and a few seconds later I noticed that wpa_supplicant lost connection
and failed to gain a new authentication.
> > Trying to associate with 00:1d:0f:b9:df:2d (SSID='quimby-net' freq=2472 MHz)
> > Authentication with 00:1d:0f:b9:df:2d timed out.
> >
> > A machine reboot was _not_ needed this time to revive the card.
> > Module unload cycle was enough to bring it back to life.
> >
> > I'm really unsure what's going on and if these two failures are related
> > to each other. Probably not...
>
> Anyway you can burp your box sooner (replace the PCI connector) to
> rule that out?
Yes, I'm going to replace the extender over the weekend.
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-15 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 10:52 Ath5k on 2.6.32 suddenly fails Michael Buesch
2010-01-11 16:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-11 16:35 ` Larry Finger
2010-01-11 16:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-11 22:36 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-15 22:29 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-15 22:40 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-15 22:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-15 22:50 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2010-01-21 12:05 ` Michael Buesch
2010-01-21 15:57 ` Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001152350.06930.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).