* [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call
@ 2010-01-17 23:21 Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-19 21:55 ` John W. Linville
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2010-01-17 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, John W. Linville
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
---
New patch I didn't include earlier.
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index 2356d84..3a3cc2f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
@@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_tx_cal_phy_setup(struct b43_wldev *dev)
b43_phy_write(dev, B43_NPHY_AFECTL_OVER, tmp | 0x0600);
regs[4] = b43_phy_read(dev, B43_NPHY_BBCFG);
- b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_NPHY_BBCFG, ~B43_NPHY_BBCFG_RSTRX);
+ b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_NPHY_BBCFG, (u16)~B43_NPHY_BBCFG_RSTRX);
tmp = b43_ntab_read(dev, B43_NTAB16(8, 3));
regs[5] = tmp;
@@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@ static int b43_nphy_rev2_cal_rx_iq(struct b43_wldev *dev,
u16 lna[3] = { 3, 3, 1 };
u16 hpf1[3] = { 7, 2, 0 };
u16 hpf2[3] = { 2, 0, 0 };
- u32 power[3];
+ u32 power[3] = { };
u16 gain_save[2];
u16 cal_gain[2];
struct nphy_iqcal_params cal_params[2];
@@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ static int b43_nphy_rev2_cal_rx_iq(struct b43_wldev *dev,
(cur_lna << 2));
/* TODO:Call N PHY RF Ctrl Override with 0x400, tmp[0],
3, 0 as arguments */
- /* TODO: Call N PHY Force RF Seq with 2 as argument */
+ b43_nphy_force_rf_sequence(dev, B43_RFSEQ_RESET2RX);
b43_nphy_stop_playback(dev);
if (playtone) {
--
1.6.4.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call
2010-01-17 23:21 [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call Rafał Miłecki
@ 2010-01-19 21:55 ` John W. Linville
2010-01-19 22:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2010-01-19 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:21:49AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> New patch I didn't include earlier.
Rafał,
I just applied this 5-patch series and the preceding 7-patch series,
and I had to fixup every single one manually due to the apparently
busted mailer you are using.
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux)
The only reason I went to this trouble is because a) I want the
N-phy stuff and b) you sent small, manageable patches. But don't
misunderstand -- I have no intention of continuing to fix these
manually.
Learn to use "git send-email" or find some other mailer to send
your patches -- I recommend Mutt. In any case, do not expect your
patches to get merged unless in the future unless you can rectify
this situation at your end. I just don't have the bandwidth for
dealing with crap like this.
Thanks,
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call
2010-01-19 21:55 ` John W. Linville
@ 2010-01-19 22:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-19 22:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-19 22:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-01-19 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John W. Linville
Cc: Rafał Miłecki, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
2010/1/19 John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:21:49AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> New patch I didn't include earlier.
>
> Rafał,
>
> I just applied this 5-patch series and the preceding 7-patch series,
> and I had to fixup every single one manually due to the apparently
> busted mailer you are using.
>
> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux)
>
> The only reason I went to this trouble is because a) I want the
> N-phy stuff and b) you sent small, manageable patches. But don't
> misunderstand -- I have no intention of continuing to fix these
> manually.
>
> Learn to use "git send-email" or find some other mailer to send
> your patches -- I recommend Mutt. In any case, do not expect your
> patches to get merged unless in the future unless you can rectify
> this situation at your end. I just don't have the bandwidth for
> dealing with crap like this.
In case this helps:
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Documentation/git-guide#Sending_patches
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call
2010-01-19 21:55 ` John W. Linville
2010-01-19 22:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-01-19 22:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-19 22:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2010-01-19 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John W. Linville
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
W dniu 19 stycznia 2010 22:55 użytkownik John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> napisał:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:21:49AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> New patch I didn't include earlier.
>
> Rafał,
>
> I just applied this 5-patch series and the preceding 7-patch series,
> and I had to fixup every single one manually due to the apparently
> busted mailer you are using.
>
> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux)
>
> The only reason I went to this trouble is because a) I want the
> N-phy stuff and b) you sent small, manageable patches. But don't
> misunderstand -- I have no intention of continuing to fix these
> manually.
>
> Learn to use "git send-email" or find some other mailer to send
> your patches -- I recommend Mutt. In any case, do not expect your
> patches to get merged unless in the future unless you can rectify
> this situation at your end. I just don't have the bandwidth for
> dealing with crap like this.
John, I strongly believe you know I'm new to whole kernel-related
stuff. That just implies I make mistakes and ask simple questions but
definitely I don't try to make your work harder on purpose. I already
resend some of my first patches and after that no one hit issue you
got with applying my patches.
I have all patches here locally, you could just ask me to resend them
using other method. Didn't have to bother that effort you did and
become angry.
--
Rafał
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call
2010-01-19 21:55 ` John W. Linville
2010-01-19 22:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-19 22:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2010-01-19 22:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-20 10:52 ` Michael Buesch
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2010-01-19 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John W. Linville
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
W dniu 19 stycznia 2010 22:55 użytkownik John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> napisał:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:21:49AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> New patch I didn't include earlier.
>
> Rafał,
>
> I just applied this 5-patch series and the preceding 7-patch series,
> and I had to fixup every single one manually due to the apparently
> busted mailer you are using.
>
> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux)
>
> The only reason I went to this trouble is because a) I want the
> N-phy stuff and b) you sent small, manageable patches. But don't
> misunderstand -- I have no intention of continuing to fix these
> manually.
>
> Learn to use "git send-email" or find some other mailer to send
> your patches -- I recommend Mutt. In any case, do not expect your
> patches to get merged unless in the future unless you can rectify
> this situation at your end. I just don't have the bandwidth for
> dealing with crap like this.
Out of curiosity, could someone tell what Opera does incorrectly when
sending patches?
--
Rafał
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call
2010-01-19 22:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2010-01-20 10:52 ` Michael Buesch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Buesch @ 2010-01-20 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bcm43xx-dev
Cc: Rafał Miłecki, John W. Linville,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 23:59:32 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Out of curiosity, could someone tell what Opera does incorrectly when
> sending patches?
They are base64 encoded.
We use a 7 or 8bit encoding for our mails.
I think that opera automatically switches to base64 encoding due to
the special characters in your first and last name.
--
Greetings, Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-20 10:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-17 23:21 [PATCH 5/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: silence warnings, add missing call Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-19 21:55 ` John W. Linville
2010-01-19 22:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-19 22:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-19 22:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-20 10:52 ` Michael Buesch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).