From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Vivek Natarajan <vivek.natraj@gmail.com>,
linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
IvDoorn@gmail.com, gwingerde@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mac80211: Retry null data frame for power save.
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:30:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002082130.10238.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265646279.3783.8.camel@johannes.berg>
On Monday 08 February 2010 17:24:39 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 18:43 +0530, Vivek Natarajan wrote:
>
> > > On a related issue: What about _inverting_ the flag, so it will
> > > be set for devices which can't give any accurate tx_status
> > > information. This has the advantage that we don't have to touch
> > > other drivers?
> >
> > Shall I rename it as HW_NO_TX_ACK_REPORT?
> > Looking at the other flags, they show some positively present
> > feature in the hw. In those lines, HW_REPORTS_TX_ACK_STATUS
> > might be better.
>
> The positive feature flag has the advantage that we don't have to touch
> any of the essentially unmaintained drivers, so I much prefer having it
> that way so maintainers can enable the flag after testing etc.
Alright. I count 2:1 votes. So "positive feature flag" it is.
BTW: I added rt2x00 project maintainers to the CC, because
If I'm not totally wrong, this patch _reduces_ some PS
features of rt2x00. This is because not all of rt2x00
supported & PS-capable/enabled devices return a proper tx_status
and therefore these devices will be the most affected AFAICT.
Any word from you guys? Or have you scrubbed the PS features already?
Regards,
Chr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-08 12:17 [PATCH v3] mac80211: Retry null data frame for power save Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-08 12:17 ` [PATCH] mac80211: Reset dynamic ps timer in Rx path Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3] mac80211: Retry null data frame for power save Christian Lamparter
2010-02-08 13:13 ` Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-08 16:24 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-08 20:30 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2010-02-08 21:02 ` Christian Lamparter
2010-02-09 7:57 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-09 8:36 ` Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-09 8:57 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002082130.10238.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vivek.natraj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).