From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Vivek Natarajan <vivek.natraj@gmail.com>,
linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
IvDoorn@gmail.com, gwingerde@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mac80211: Retry null data frame for power save.
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:02:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002082202.24297.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002082130.10238.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
On Monday 08 February 2010 21:30:09 Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Monday 08 February 2010 17:24:39 Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 18:43 +0530, Vivek Natarajan wrote:
> >
> > > > On a related issue: What about _inverting_ the flag, so it will
> > > > be set for devices which can't give any accurate tx_status
> > > > information. This has the advantage that we don't have to touch
> > > > other drivers?
> > >
> > > Shall I rename it as HW_NO_TX_ACK_REPORT?
> > > Looking at the other flags, they show some positively present
> > > feature in the hw. In those lines, HW_REPORTS_TX_ACK_STATUS
> > > might be better.
> >
> > The positive feature flag has the advantage that we don't have to touch
> > any of the essentially unmaintained drivers, so I much prefer having it
> > that way so maintainers can enable the flag after testing etc.
>
> BTW: I added rt2x00 project maintainers to the CC, because
> If I'm not totally wrong, this patch _reduces_ some PS
> features of rt2x00. This is because not all of rt2x00
> supported & PS-capable/enabled devices return a proper tx_status
> and therefore these devices will be the most affected AFAICT.
>
> Any word from you guys? Or have you scrubbed the PS features already?
>
Oops,
Johannes pointed out that the patch does not break rt2x00.
and indeed ... he IS right and I misread the check !HW_STATUS_CHECK
in ieee80211_enable_ps.
Sorry for all the noise!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-08 12:17 [PATCH v3] mac80211: Retry null data frame for power save Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-08 12:17 ` [PATCH] mac80211: Reset dynamic ps timer in Rx path Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3] mac80211: Retry null data frame for power save Christian Lamparter
2010-02-08 13:13 ` Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-08 16:24 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-08 20:30 ` Christian Lamparter
2010-02-08 21:02 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2010-02-09 7:57 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-09 8:36 ` Vivek Natarajan
2010-02-09 8:57 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002082202.24297.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vivek.natraj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).