linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: cfg80211 support
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:24:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002111324.57501.holgerschurig@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100211120133.GA3136@sortiz.org>

> What I changed is triggerring the scan work whenever the last
> one is done, i.e. triggering it from lbs_ret_scan().

Ah, that makes sense.

> My initial thought was that you could have 2 lbs_cfg_scan()
> running at the same time since you could potentially have a 2nd
> lbs_cfg_scan() call before scan_request is actually set.

Hmm, even when cfg80211 would allow this, I wouldn't allow this 
in the driver. All the hoops with the delayed-scan-work is 
because the firmware can't send a I'm-on-powersafe-notification 
to the current AP while being on other channels. So I have to 
make sure to return from time to time to my AP, so that I won't 
loose packets for me and won't be disconnected.

If now two scan_req and therefore two scan workers run, the time 
we're away from our "home channel" increases, which also 
increase the deauthentication problem.


Oh, and btw: we can later add an optimization that if we aren't 
connected at all, we do all scans in one-go, without delays. We 
still need to send several scan-commands to the firmware, to 
reduce the possible that a huuuuuge scan response overflows some 
firmware buffer limit.


Thanks for your answers.

Best regards,
Holger

-- 
http://www.holgerschurig.de

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-11 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-02  0:09 [PATCH] libertas: cfg80211 support Samuel Ortiz
2010-02-02 20:36 ` John W. Linville
2010-02-03  9:31   ` Holger Schurig
2010-02-03 12:04     ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-02-03 15:32       ` Holger Schurig
2010-02-03 20:30         ` Dan Williams
2010-02-04  7:28           ` Holger Schurig
2010-02-04 21:49             ` Dan Williams
2010-02-04  9:52 ` Holger Schurig
2010-02-11 12:01   ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-02-11 12:24     ` Holger Schurig [this message]
2010-02-04 10:11 ` Holger Schurig
2010-02-11 12:03   ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-02-04 13:44 ` [PATCH] libertas+cfg80211: better disconnect support Holger Schurig
2010-02-15 10:46 ` [PATCH] libertas: cfg80211 support Holger Schurig
     [not found]   ` <cdd918981002240005o1fa50956yfb2a692716c06a55@mail.gmail.com>
2010-02-24 23:35     ` Dan Williams
2010-02-25  8:42       ` David MOUSSAUD
2010-02-25  8:48         ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-25 18:05           ` Andrey Yurovsky
2010-03-07 17:32             ` Kalle Valo
2010-03-07 17:52               ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-02-24  8:22 ` David MOUSSAUD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201002111324.57501.holgerschurig@gmail.com \
    --to=holgerschurig@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).