From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netrolller.3d@gmail.com,
benoit.papillault@free.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath5k: fix injection in monitor mode
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:10:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003031010.49887.br1@einfach.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100302094238.GA24391@jm.kir.nu>
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 18:42:38 Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:51:58AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > injected frames have to use AR5K_PKT_TYPE_NORMAL, otherwise the hardware
> > thinks it can mess with the contents of the frame - e.g. update the TSF
> > of an injected beacon. injected frames should be sent as they are
> > provided.
>
> Why would we never want the hardware to update fields in injected
> frames? Unless I missed something, this seems to break hostapd use cases
> where the hardware is indeed expected to update the timestamp in Probe
> Response frames and set up seq# and duration etc. as appropriate for the
> frames (the latter may be driver/mac80211 work; the timestamp needs to
> come from hardware/firmware).
ok, i see.
> If we want to have an option to prevent hardware from touching the frame
> payload, that really should be an option (a radiotap and TX control
> flags, etc.), not default functionality for monitor interface. The use
> case for this seems to be some kind of testing purpose and that should
> not really break more common functionality.
yes, we use it for testing IBSS mode (merging, TSF updates) by injecting
custom beacons. i guess other packet injectors would also assume that their
packets go out untouched.
so what would be a way to support that properly?
what about a monitor mode flag?
bruno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-02 2:51 [PATCH v2] ath5k: fix injection in monitor mode Bruno Randolf
2010-03-02 9:42 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-03-02 10:02 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-03-03 1:10 ` Bruno Randolf [this message]
2010-03-03 8:18 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-03-03 8:42 ` Gábor Stefanik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003031010.49887.br1@einfach.org \
--to=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).