From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rfkill sysfs ABI
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:52:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100312195257.GB17689@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100312191819.73ac4700@schatten.dmk.lab>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:18:19PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> sorry! I just realised that you already have the blocked_sw / blocked_hw one's
> queued.
>
> This just changes the name of blocked_sw and blocked_hw to "soft" and
> "hard".
>
> I don't know what you wanna do. I'm fine with blocked_hw and
> blocked_sw as it's referenced as such (hw/sw) in the code, but Marcel
> wanted to get away from the "hard blocked by hardware" notation, as it
> suggests that the transmitter could only be blocked by hardware...
Could you just submit a third patch that makes the requested name changes?
Thanks!
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-12 18:03 [PATCH 0/2] rfkill sysfs ABI florian
2010-03-12 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] Document the " florian
2010-03-12 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] enhance sysfs rfkill interface florian
2010-03-12 18:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-03-12 20:57 ` Florian Mickler
2010-03-12 21:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-03-12 22:39 ` Florian Mickler
2010-03-12 22:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-03-13 9:41 ` Florian Mickler
2010-03-13 9:44 ` [PATCH] rename new rfkill sysfs knobs florian
2010-03-13 9:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-03-13 12:31 ` [PATCH v2] " florian
2010-03-18 10:59 ` Florian Mickler
2010-03-18 13:42 ` John W. Linville
2010-03-13 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] enhance sysfs rfkill interface Dmitry Torokhov
2010-03-13 12:33 ` Florian Mickler
2010-03-12 23:48 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-03-12 18:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] rfkill sysfs ABI Florian Mickler
2010-03-12 19:52 ` John W. Linville [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100312195257.GB17689@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).