linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ssb: do not read SPROM if it does not exist
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:21:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100319202120.GD9552@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201003192041.47211.mb@bu3sch.de>

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:41:47PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 19 March 2010 20:08:07 John W. Linville wrote:
> > +	switch (bus->chip_id) {
> > +	case 0x4312:
> > +		return SSB_CHIPCO_CHST_4312_SPROM_PRESENT(bus->chipco.status);
> 
> Not sure why we want to hide the logic in defines. But I don't care much, either.

To me it just seems clearer than a bunch of long and ugly bit
operations that differ in the details but are logically accomplishing
the same thing.
 
> > +	case 0x4322:
> > +		return SSB_CHIPCO_CHST_4322_SPROM_PRESENT(bus->chipco.status);
> > +	case 0x4325:
> > +		return SSB_CHIPCO_CHST_4325_SPROM_PRESENT(bus->chipco.status);
> > +	default:
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +	if (bus->chip_rev >= 31)
> 
> This check is wrong.
> You need to check the chipcommon core revision. Not the chip revision.

I'm sorry, I had trouble figuring-out what you meant (since chip_rev
comes from a chipcommon register).  I think you mean this:

-       if (bus->chip_rev >= 31)
+       if (bus->chipco.dev->id.revision >= 31)

Is that right?

John

> > +		return bus->chipco.capabilities & SSB_CHIPCO_CAP_SPROM;
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> > index 24f9885..3b4da23 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> > @@ -394,6 +394,9 @@ extern int ssb_bus_sdiobus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus,
> >  
> >  extern void ssb_bus_unregister(struct ssb_bus *bus);
> >  
> > +/* Does the device have an SPROM? */
> > +extern bool ssb_is_sprom_available(struct ssb_bus *bus);
> > +
> >  /* Set a fallback SPROM.
> >   * See kdoc at the function definition for complete documentation. */
> >  extern int ssb_arch_set_fallback_sprom(const struct ssb_sprom *sprom);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_chipcommon.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_chipcommon.h
> > index 4e27acf..4e5726d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_chipcommon.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_chipcommon.h
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> >  #define   SSB_CHIPCO_CAP_UARTCLK_INT	0x00000008	/* UARTs are driven by internal divided clock */
> >  #define  SSB_CHIPCO_CAP_UARTGPIO	0x00000020	/* UARTs on GPIO 15-12 */
> >  #define  SSB_CHIPCO_CAP_EXTBUS		0x000000C0	/* External buses present */
> > +#define  SSB_CHIPCO_CAP_SPROM		0x40000000	/* SPROM present */
> >  #define  SSB_CHIPCO_CAP_FLASHT		0x00000700	/* Flash Type */
> 
> Probably keep ordering of capabilities correct.

Oops, sorry...

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-19 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-18 17:46 RFC: A workaround for BCM43XX devices with no on-board SPROM Larry Finger
2010-03-18 19:31 ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-18 20:20   ` John W. Linville
2010-03-18 20:31     ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-18 21:38   ` Larry Finger
2010-03-19  7:36     ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-18 20:51 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2010-03-18 20:53 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-18 21:10   ` Larry Finger
2010-03-18 21:20     ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-18 21:47       ` Larry Finger
2010-03-19 18:40     ` Kalle Valo
2010-03-19 19:08 ` [PATCH] ssb: do not read SPROM if it does not exist John W. Linville
2010-03-19 19:41   ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-19 19:46     ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-19 20:21     ` John W. Linville [this message]
2010-03-19 20:30       ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-19 20:31         ` John W. Linville
2010-03-19 20:33   ` [PATCH v2] " John W. Linville
2010-03-19 20:41     ` [PATCH v3] " John W. Linville
2010-03-19 21:12       ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-19 22:10         ` John W. Linville
2010-03-19 22:10         ` [PATCH v4] " John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100319202120.GD9552@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).