From: Bruno Randolf <randolf.bruno@googlemail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com" <lorenzo.bianconi@fluidmesh.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Tony Huang <ht6100@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mac80211: Revise,pending queue depth in ieee80211_local data structure
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:44:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003201144.24471.randolf.bruno@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0b9368788449213d36b75dccd97c6a6@localhost>
On Saturday 20 March 2010 03:49:27 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:33:47 +0100, "lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com"
>
> >> if (!skb_queue_empty(&local->pending[queue]))
> >>
> >> tasklet_schedule(&local->tx_pending_tasklet);
> >>
> >> -
> >> - rcu_read_lock();
> >> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdata, &local->interfaces, list)
> >> - netif_tx_wake_queue(netdev_get_tx_queue(sdata->dev, queue));
> >> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> That's obviously wrong, need to move the code to the else branch of the
> above if instead.
>
> > I tested the patch on kernel 2.6.32.7 with compat-wireless-2010-03-03
>
> but
>
> > it seems that the problem is not solved. If I set the lowest priority
>
> queue
>
> > (Backgreound), the system will crash for an out of memory panic. During
>
> the
>
> > tests I carried out, I transmit 50Mbps UDP traffic.
>
> How are you generating traffic? I just dumped like 2Gbps traffic at it
> and everything works just fine. I verified queues are stopped and started
> properly.
i think i'm hitting the same bug, but not sure (i will try to check next
week). this is easy to reproduce, but you need 4 (at least 3) machines:
setup 2 wireless cards, talking to each other (i use IBSS) on different
machines. then setup routing like this:
[1] - [WL1] - [WL2] - [2]
now send more UDP traffic than the wireless link can handle (iperf -u -b 50M
for example) between [1] and [2]. watch the free memory get less and less at
[WL1] until it chrashes.
bruno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-20 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 15:43 [PATCH V2] mac80211: Revise,pending queue depth in ieee80211_local data structure lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com
2010-03-18 16:19 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-18 18:12 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-18 18:20 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-19 9:33 ` lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com
2010-03-19 18:49 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-20 2:44 ` Bruno Randolf [this message]
2010-03-20 3:07 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-03-20 20:02 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2010-03-20 20:40 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-21 2:01 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-03-21 2:22 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-22 18:12 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-31 8:12 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-03-31 8:13 ` Johannes Berg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-18 15:32 lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003201144.24471.randolf.bruno@gmail.com \
--to=randolf.bruno@googlemail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=ht6100@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@fluidmesh.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).