From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
To: Joerg Pommnitz <pommnitz@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any news regarding multicast rate configuration?
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:36:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100409083651.GA3627@jm.kir.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <195455.53971.qm@web51405.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:07:36PM -0700, Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> do you mean that I can't configure a separate rate
> for multicast frames? I thought that the rate bitmask
> was a way to tell the RC algorithm what rates to
> consider. Since multicast frames do not get acknowledged
> they are not subject to the automatic rate selection.
At least for now, there is no separate configuration option for
multicast frames, i.e., the same TX rate mask will apply to rate
selection for both unicast and multicast frames. Multicast frames are
subject to rate selection; the current mac80211 rate algorithms may not
do much in that area, though, apart from letting the lowest available
rate be selected. By changing which rates are enabled, you can change
that lowest rate..
> In fact, I'm perfectly happy to leave the rate selection
> for unicast frames in the capable hands of Minstrel, but
> I need something better than 1Mb/s for multicast. The
> lowest data rate just isn't enough for live video feeds.
Like I said in the previous mail, as long as you are fine dropping 1
Mbps from unicast rates, you can get higher rate for multicast..
> What I need is a way to tell mac80211 to use one specific
> basic rate for broadcast and multicast.
Why would the currently available mechanism not work for you?
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-08 13:45 Any news regarding multicast rate configuration? Joerg Pommnitz
2010-04-08 19:43 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-04-08 20:07 ` AW: " Joerg Pommnitz
2010-04-09 8:36 ` Jouni Malinen [this message]
2010-04-09 9:34 ` Joerg Pommnitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100409083651.GA3627@jm.kir.nu \
--to=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pommnitz@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).