From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:43963 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755032Ab0EFK43 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 06:56:29 -0400 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so5000849fxm.19 for ; Thu, 06 May 2010 03:56:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Helmut Schaa To: John Linville Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rt2x00: rt2800: don't overwrite SIFS values on erp changes Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 12:56:15 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn , Gertjan van Wingerde References: <201005061229.44923.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> <201005061251.09142.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201005061251.09142.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <201005061256.15682.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Donnerstag 06 Mai 2010 schrieb Helmut Schaa: > Nevertheless I don't get good transfer speeds. I didn't measure exactly but > just with scp. And I got ~600-700 KByte/s for TX and 400-500KByte/s for RX. > This is still quite low. Nevermind, tested on a MIPS board. So maybe it's not the wireless but the CPU that's limiting scp performance. When I find some time I'll try plain TCP connections. Helmut