* Re: [Oops-report] problem with ath9k at shutdown
2010-05-19 18:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-05-19 21:35 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-19 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huub Reuver
Cc: John W. Linville, Luis Rodriguez, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:40:04AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41:40PM -0700, Huub Reuver wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 01:24:04PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:55:31AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:32:41AM -0700, John W. Linville wrote:
> >> > > > Did you try 2.6.34? I'm pretty sure we merged a fix for this...
> >> > >
> >> > > Ditto, and I think it was not related to ath9k but mac80211.
> >> > >
> >> > > Was it this maybe?
> >> > >
> >> > > commit a9f042cbe5284f34ccff15f3084477e11b39b17b
> >> > > Author: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> >> > > Date: Sun Feb 28 00:56:24 2010 +0800
> >> > >
> >> > > ath9k: fix lockdep warning when unloading module
> >> > >
> >> > > Johannes had noted:
> >> > >
> >> > > "I think the problem is that the locking for sta_notify changed, and a
> >> > > patch that was written for the new locking was backported to the old,
> >> > > irq-disabled, locking."
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, maybe that is what I was thinking about....
> >>
> >> The traces do not look similar to me, but I'm not a programmer.
> >>
> >> I have done a few tests:
> >> 2.6.32.9 not affected
> >> 2.6.32.13 affected
> >> 2.6.33.3 affected
> >> 2.6.33.4 affected
> >> 2.6.34 the problem seems to have been fixed.
> >>
> >> Sorry for my slow report and response.
> >> Thanks for your quick answer, I'll have to switch to 2.6.34 for a
> >> production kernel.
> >
> > Eh, I am not sure what happened here... this must've been a fix
> > regression as I do not recall seeing this on earlier 2.6.32.y releases.
> > Can you try an earlier 2.6.32.y?
>
> I have a fix for this, I'll post this soon, testing 2.6.33 now.
In case you are not subscribed to linux-wireless, please try:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ath9k: fix lockdep warning when unloading module" on stable kernels
Johannes' patch 34e8950 titled:
mac80211: allow station add/remove to sleep
changed the way mac80211 adds and removes peers. The new
sta_add() / sta_remove() callbacks allowed the driver callbacks
to sleep. Johannes also ported ath9k to use sta_add() / sta_remove()
via the patch 4ca7786 titled:
ath9k: convert to new station add/remove callbacks
but this patch forgot to address a change in locking issue which
Ming Lei eventually found on his 2.6.33-wl #12 build. The 2.6.33-wl
build includes code for the 802.11 subsystem for 2.6.34 though so did
already have the above two patches (ath9k_sta_remove() on his trace),
the 2.6.33 kernel did not however have these two patches. Ming eventually
cured his lockdep warnign via the patch a9f042c titled:
ath9k: fix lockdep warning when unloading module
This went in to 2.6.34 and although it was not marked as a stable
fix it did get trickled down and applied on both 2.6.33 and 2.6.32.
In review, the culprits:
mac80211: allow station add/remove to sleep
git describe --contains 34e895075e21be3e21e71d6317440d1ee7969ad0
v2.6.34-rc1~233^2~49^2~107
ath9k: convert to new station add/remove callbacks
git describe --contains 4ca778605cfec53d8a689f0b57babb93b030c784
v2.6.34-rc1~233^2~49^2~10
ath9k: fix lockdep warning when unloading module
This last one trickled down to 2.6.33 (OK), 2.6.33 (invalid) and 2.6.32 (invalid).
git describe --contains a9f042cbe5284f34ccff15f3084477e11b39b17b
v2.6.34-rc2~48^2~77^2~7
git describe --contains 0524bcfa80f1fffb4e1fe18a0a28900869a58a7c
v2.6.33.2~125
git describe --contains 0dcc9985f34aef3c60bffab3dfc7f7ba3748f35a
v2.6.32.11~79
The patch titled "ath9k: fix lockdep warning when unloading module"
should be reverted on both 2.6.33 and 2.6.32 as it is invalid and
actually ended up causing the following warning:
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan31: link becomes ready
phy0: WMM queue=2 aci=0 acm=0 aifs=3 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 txop=0
phy0: WMM queue=3 aci=1 acm=0 aifs=7 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 txop=0
phy0: WMM queue=1 aci=2 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=7 cWmax=15 txop=94
phy0: WMM queue=0 aci=3 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=3 cWmax=7 txop=47
phy0: device now idle
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:143 local_bh_enable_ip+0x7b/0xa0()
Hardware name: 7660A14
Modules linked in: ath9k(-) mac80211 ath cfg80211 <whatever-bleh-etc>
Pid: 2003, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.32.11 #6
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8105d178>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xb0
[<ffffffff8105d1bf>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20
[<ffffffff81063f8b>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x7b/0xa0
[<ffffffff815121e4>] _spin_unlock_bh+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffffa034aea5>] ath_tx_node_cleanup+0x185/0x1b0 [ath9k]
[<ffffffffa0345597>] ath9k_sta_notify+0x57/0xb0 [ath9k]
[<ffffffffa02ac51a>] __sta_info_unlink+0x15a/0x260 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa02ac658>] sta_info_unlink+0x38/0x60 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa02b3fbe>] ieee80211_set_disassoc+0x1ae/0x210 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa02b42d9>] ieee80211_mgd_deauth+0x109/0x110 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa02ba409>] ieee80211_deauth+0x19/0x20 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa028160e>] __cfg80211_mlme_deauth+0xee/0x130 [cfg80211]
[<ffffffff81118540>] ? init_object+0x50/0x90
[<ffffffffa0285429>] __cfg80211_disconnect+0x159/0x1d0 [cfg80211]
[<ffffffffa027125f>] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x10f/0x450 [cfg80211]
[<ffffffff81514ca7>] notifier_call_chain+0x47/0x90
[<ffffffff8107f501>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
[<ffffffff81442d66>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff8144352d>] dev_close+0x4d/0xa0
[<ffffffff814439a8>] rollback_registered+0x48/0x120
[<ffffffff81443a9d>] unregister_netdevice+0x1d/0x70
[<ffffffffa02b6cc4>] ieee80211_remove_interfaces+0x84/0xc0 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa02aa072>] ieee80211_unregister_hw+0x42/0xf0 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0347bde>] ath_detach+0x8e/0x180 [ath9k]
[<ffffffffa0347ce1>] ath_cleanup+0x11/0x50 [ath9k]
[<ffffffffa0351a2c>] ath_pci_remove+0x1c/0x20 [ath9k]
[<ffffffff8129d712>] pci_device_remove+0x32/0x60
[<ffffffff81332373>] __device_release_driver+0x53/0xb0
[<ffffffff81332498>] driver_detach+0xc8/0xd0
[<ffffffff81331405>] bus_remove_driver+0x85/0xe0
[<ffffffff81332a5a>] driver_unregister+0x5a/0x90
[<ffffffff8129da00>] pci_unregister_driver+0x40/0xb0
[<ffffffffa03518d0>] ath_pci_exit+0x10/0x20 [ath9k]
[<ffffffffa0353cd5>] ath9k_exit+0x9/0x2a [ath9k]
[<ffffffff81092838>] sys_delete_module+0x1a8/0x270
[<ffffffff8107ebe9>] ? up_read+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff81011f82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---[ end trace fad957019ffdd40b ]---
phy0: Removed STA 00:22:6b:56:fd:e8
phy0: Destroyed STA 00:22:6b:56:fd:e8
wlan31: deauthenticating from 00:22:6b:56:fd:e8 by local choice (reason=3)
ath9k 0000:16:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
The original lockdep fixed an issue where due to the new changes
the driver was not disabling the bottom halves but it is incorrect
to do this on the older kernels since IRQs are already disabled.
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---
Greg, I've tested 2.6.32.11 and 2.6.33.4 both with and without
this patch. This cures the WARNING for both. This same patch
applies to both 2.6.33.y and 2.6.33.y branches of the stable
series.
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
index a232361..e499fb6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
@@ -2190,7 +2190,7 @@ void ath_tx_node_cleanup(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_node *an)
if (ATH_TXQ_SETUP(sc, i)) {
txq = &sc->tx.txq[i];
- spin_lock_bh(&txq->axq_lock);
+ spin_lock(&txq->axq_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(ac,
ac_tmp, &txq->axq_acq, list) {
@@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ void ath_tx_node_cleanup(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_node *an)
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&txq->axq_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&txq->axq_lock);
}
}
}
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread