linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
	Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
	Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: rt2800, minstrel_ht & mac80211
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:22:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006041222.49820.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> (raw)

Hi,

While working on throughput problems with some mcs rates on rt2800 cards I've
noticed a strange issue between rt2800, minstrel_ht and mac80211.

Despite the fact that rt2800 always reported MCS15 as _not_ successful (and
it was really never successful), minstrel_ht's rc_stats always claimed that
the attempt was successful.

rt2800 has a global rate fallback table (something like MCS15 -> MCS14 ->
MCS13 ...), so it is capable of trying a frame at different rates but we
cannot specify the rates to be used for every single frame. Hence, rt2800
does not set hw->max_rates and thus ends up with max_rates = 1 but since
rt2800 will try different rates it will fill the tx status with all the rates
it really tried.

Unfortunately, mac80211 (status.c) decides to drop all reported rates >=
max_rates and thus we end up with minstrel_ht thinking that MCS15 was
successful while rt2800 reported that it tried MCS15,14,13 and 12 was
finally successful.

This meant that minstrel most of the time selected MCS15 as tx rate which
resulted in a huge number of retries and thus a very slow throughput.

status.c:

178                 /* the HW cannot have attempted that rate */
179                 if (i >= hw->max_rates) {
180                         info->status.rates[i].idx = -1;
181                         info->status.rates[i].count = 0;

Johannes, is there a valid reason for this check in status.c. Can we remove
it without breaking anything else?

What other options would we have to fix this issue? Just use max_rates = 4 
in rt2800 even if we will only use the first rate provided by minstrel and
then fall back to the global fallback setup (I tried that already and it
works just fine but seems not correct to me)?

Thanks,
Helmut

             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-04 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-04 10:22 Helmut Schaa [this message]
2010-06-04 10:28 ` rt2800, minstrel_ht & mac80211 Johannes Berg
2010-06-04 10:32   ` Helmut Schaa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201006041222.49820.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --to=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).