From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
To: linville@tuxdriver.com
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/17] ath5k: rename ath5k_txbuf_free() to ath5k_txbuf_free_skb()
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:11:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616101117.10067.527.stgit@tt-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100616100809.10067.34787.stgit@tt-desk>
Rename ath5k_txbuf_free() to ath5k_txbuf_free_skb() since this is what it does:
it frees the skb and not the buf. Same for ath5k_rxbuf_free().
Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Acked-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
index 936afd7..8e6b54d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
@@ -311,7 +311,8 @@ static int ath5k_rxbuf_setup(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
static int ath5k_txbuf_setup(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
struct ath5k_buf *bf,
struct ath5k_txq *txq, int padsize);
-static inline void ath5k_txbuf_free(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
+
+static inline void ath5k_txbuf_free_skb(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
struct ath5k_buf *bf)
{
BUG_ON(!bf);
@@ -323,7 +324,7 @@ static inline void ath5k_txbuf_free(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
bf->skb = NULL;
}
-static inline void ath5k_rxbuf_free(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
+static inline void ath5k_rxbuf_free_skb(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
struct ath5k_buf *bf)
{
struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
@@ -1444,11 +1445,11 @@ ath5k_desc_free(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct ath5k_buf *bf;
- ath5k_txbuf_free(sc, sc->bbuf);
+ ath5k_txbuf_free_skb(sc, sc->bbuf);
list_for_each_entry(bf, &sc->txbuf, list)
- ath5k_txbuf_free(sc, bf);
+ ath5k_txbuf_free_skb(sc, bf);
list_for_each_entry(bf, &sc->rxbuf, list)
- ath5k_rxbuf_free(sc, bf);
+ ath5k_rxbuf_free_skb(sc, bf);
/* Free memory associated with all descriptors */
pci_free_consistent(pdev, sc->desc_len, sc->desc, sc->desc_daddr);
@@ -1603,7 +1604,7 @@ ath5k_txq_drainq(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ath5k_txq *txq)
list_for_each_entry_safe(bf, bf0, &txq->q, list) {
ath5k_debug_printtxbuf(sc, bf);
- ath5k_txbuf_free(sc, bf);
+ ath5k_txbuf_free_skb(sc, bf);
spin_lock_bh(&sc->txbuflock);
list_move_tail(&bf->list, &sc->txbuf);
@@ -2650,7 +2651,7 @@ ath5k_stop_hw(struct ath5k_softc *sc)
ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_RESET,
"putting device to sleep\n");
}
- ath5k_txbuf_free(sc, sc->bbuf);
+ ath5k_txbuf_free_skb(sc, sc->bbuf);
mmiowb();
mutex_unlock(&sc->lock);
@@ -3376,7 +3377,7 @@ ath5k_beacon_update(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
ath5k_debug_dump_skb(sc, skb, "BC ", 1);
- ath5k_txbuf_free(sc, sc->bbuf);
+ ath5k_txbuf_free_skb(sc, sc->bbuf);
sc->bbuf->skb = skb;
ret = ath5k_beacon_setup(sc, sc->bbuf);
if (ret)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-16 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-16 10:11 [PATCH 00/17] ath5: descriptor cleanup series Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 01/17] ath5k: more debug prints for resets Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` Bruno Randolf [this message]
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 03/17] ath5k: fix some comment typos Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 04/17] ath5k: fix rx descriptor debugging Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 05/17] ath5k: print more errors when decriptor setup fails Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 06/17] ath5k: reset more pointers after we free skbs Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 07/17] ath5k: unify rx descriptor error handling Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 08/17] ath5k: split descriptor handling and frame receive Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 09/17] ath5k: move checks and stats into new function Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 10/17] ath5k: use direct function calls for descriptors when possible Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 11/17] ath5k: cosmetic changes in ath5k_hw_proc_5212_rx_status() Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 12/17] ath5k: remove pointless rx error overlay struct Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 13/17] ath5k: review and add comments for descriptors Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 14/17] ath5k: update 5210/5211 frame types Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 15/17] ath5k: take descriptor differences between 5210 and 5211 into account Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 16/17] ath5k: review RX descriptor functions Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 17/17] ath5k: report PHY error frames only for chips which need it Bruno Randolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100616101117.10067.527.stgit@tt-desk \
--to=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox