From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
To: linville@tuxdriver.com
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/17] ath5k: cosmetic changes in ath5k_hw_proc_5212_rx_status()
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:12:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616101207.10067.97179.stgit@tt-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100616100809.10067.34787.stgit@tt-desk>
Just whitespace and indentation.
Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Acked-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c
index b5a5d45..50fc931 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c
@@ -577,7 +577,8 @@ static int ath5k_hw_proc_5210_rx_status(struct ath5k_hw *ah,
* Proccess the rx status descriptor on 5212
*/
static int ath5k_hw_proc_5212_rx_status(struct ath5k_hw *ah,
- struct ath5k_desc *desc, struct ath5k_rx_status *rs)
+ struct ath5k_desc *desc,
+ struct ath5k_rx_status *rs)
{
struct ath5k_hw_rx_status *rx_status;
struct ath5k_hw_rx_error *rx_err;
@@ -589,7 +590,7 @@ static int ath5k_hw_proc_5212_rx_status(struct ath5k_hw *ah,
/* No frame received / not ready */
if (unlikely(!(rx_status->rx_status_1 &
- AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_DONE)))
+ AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_DONE)))
return -EINPROGRESS;
/*
@@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static int ath5k_hw_proc_5212_rx_status(struct ath5k_hw *ah,
*/
if (rx_status->rx_status_1 & AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_KEY_INDEX_VALID)
rs->rs_keyix = AR5K_REG_MS(rx_status->rx_status_1,
- AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_KEY_INDEX);
+ AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_KEY_INDEX);
else
rs->rs_keyix = AR5K_RXKEYIX_INVALID;
@@ -623,7 +624,7 @@ static int ath5k_hw_proc_5212_rx_status(struct ath5k_hw *ah,
* Receive/descriptor errors
*/
if (!(rx_status->rx_status_1 &
- AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_FRAME_RECEIVE_OK)) {
+ AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_FRAME_RECEIVE_OK)) {
if (rx_status->rx_status_1 &
AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_CRC_ERROR)
rs->rs_status |= AR5K_RXERR_CRC;
@@ -644,7 +645,6 @@ static int ath5k_hw_proc_5212_rx_status(struct ath5k_hw *ah,
AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS1_MIC_ERROR)
rs->rs_status |= AR5K_RXERR_MIC;
}
-
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-16 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-16 10:11 [PATCH 00/17] ath5: descriptor cleanup series Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 01/17] ath5k: more debug prints for resets Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 02/17] ath5k: rename ath5k_txbuf_free() to ath5k_txbuf_free_skb() Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 03/17] ath5k: fix some comment typos Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 04/17] ath5k: fix rx descriptor debugging Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 05/17] ath5k: print more errors when decriptor setup fails Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 06/17] ath5k: reset more pointers after we free skbs Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 07/17] ath5k: unify rx descriptor error handling Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 08/17] ath5k: split descriptor handling and frame receive Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:11 ` [PATCH 09/17] ath5k: move checks and stats into new function Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 10/17] ath5k: use direct function calls for descriptors when possible Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` Bruno Randolf [this message]
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 12/17] ath5k: remove pointless rx error overlay struct Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 13/17] ath5k: review and add comments for descriptors Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 14/17] ath5k: update 5210/5211 frame types Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 15/17] ath5k: take descriptor differences between 5210 and 5211 into account Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 16/17] ath5k: review RX descriptor functions Bruno Randolf
2010-06-16 10:12 ` [PATCH 17/17] ath5k: report PHY error frames only for chips which need it Bruno Randolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100616101207.10067.97179.stgit@tt-desk \
--to=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).