From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from www.clear-code.com ([219.94.198.64]:47051 "EHLO
	mail.clear-code.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754791Ab0FPPCi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:02:38 -0400
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:02:23 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20100617.000223.656204364469558896.kou@clear-code.com>
To: linville@tuxdriver.com
Cc: mcgrof@gmail.com, Stephen.Chen@atheros.com, David.Quan@atheros.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michael.Green@atheros.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zd1211rw: ignore unknown regulatory domain.
From: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100616134421.GB2404@tuxdriver.com>
References: <AANLkTin9bG4qDEKwgOXmlR3k9wZ-JBSIlh3JzYjzVDeY@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100616.215523.1718341995174283889.kou@clear-code.com>
	<20100616134421.GB2404@tuxdriver.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Hi,

In <20100616134421.GB2404@tuxdriver.com>
  "Re: [PATCH] zd1211rw: ignore unknown regulatory domain." on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:44:22 -0400,
  "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:55:23PM +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> 
>> I used 'ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_GW_US54GXS' as a macro name for
>> 0x49 because 0x49 is used by GW-US54GXS. Is it OK? Or should
>> I use other name for it?
> 
> Hopefully someone can suggest a better name.  Anyone know what inspired
> "ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_ADD"?

'ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_3' was used in another patch:
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/47220/

But I don't know why '3' was used...


Thanks,
--
kou