From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:45608 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751322Ab0FWTpL (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:45:11 -0400 Received: from uucp by smtp.tuxdriver.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ORVsl-0004aP-1L for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:45:11 -0400 Received: from linville-t400.local (linville-t400.local [127.0.0.1]) by linville-t400.local (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5NJgqVP027231 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:42:52 -0400 Received: (from linville@localhost) by linville-t400.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o5NJgqQe027229 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:42:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:42:51 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: wireless-next-2.6 rebase 2010-06-23 Message-ID: <20100623194251.GG15205@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: FYI...in order to avoid merging a patch series with build breakage, I'm rebasing wireless-next-2.6. The master-2010-06-21 tag is still valid, but the master-2010-06-22 tag is no longer an ancestor of master. If you have no idea what I mean, then feel free to ignore this message. :-) Most people should be using wireless-testing anyway. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.