From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Cc: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" <ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/3] ath5k: trace resets
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:12:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100721011227.GB1999@tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007211004.59372.br1@einfach.org>
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 06:04:59PM -0700, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Tue July 20 2010 23:52:00 Bob Copeland wrote:
> > > again, here my same concerns: printing the reasons for resets is
> > > something which is useful on embedded boards and production setups which
> > > can't have tracing enabled. which is why i want to object against this
> > > change!
> >
> > What Johannes said wrt performance: during tracing, only the binary
> > representations of the data are written to the trace ring buffer, so
> > unlike the current debug code, we aren't doing printk formatting until
> > the trace buffer is read. You can save the raw binary data from the
> > trace and do formatting on another machine.
>
> that's true, but try to run a kernel with tracing compiled in and NOT runtime
> enabled on a small embedded board (soekris net48xx for example) and you'll see
> the difference. without tracing you can get 22Mbps, with tracing max 15Mbps
> UDP thruput. that means you cannot run a kernel with tracing enabled on a
> production system, which also means you cannot log the reasons for a reset
> there any more. and most of the problems we what to trace (e.g. stuck queue)
> happen only after days or weeks of operation in production environments...
>
> > Another advantage is better granularity: if you only care about watching
> > tx on the cab queue, you can dynamically filter based on the tracepoint
> > arguments, something like:
> >
> > # echo "qnum == 6" > /debug/tracing/events/ath5k/ath5k_tx/filter
> >
> > With the debug printks, you have to hack the driver or grep and hope
> > the printk buffer didn't overflow and spill what you were looking for.
>
> no doubt, i can see the advantages...
>
> so let's go ahead with tracing, since we can always build less performant
> tracing kernels when we want to track down problems.
FWIW I intend on adding tracing as well to ath9k_hw on the hw-ops.
Hence the hw-ops.h file, etc.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-17 19:35 [PATCH/RFC 0/3] ath5k: add driver tracepoints Bob Copeland
2010-07-17 19:35 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] ath5k: log descriptor chains at a new debug level Bob Copeland
2010-07-20 5:01 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-07-17 19:35 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] ath5k: use tracing for packet tx/rx dump Bob Copeland
2010-07-17 19:35 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] ath5k: trace resets Bob Copeland
2010-07-20 5:20 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-07-20 14:52 ` Bob Copeland
2010-07-21 1:04 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-07-21 1:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2010-07-21 3:41 ` Bob Copeland
2010-07-21 5:17 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-07-21 5:46 ` Ben Gamari
2010-07-21 7:53 ` Johannes Berg
2010-07-22 9:21 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-07-20 5:11 ` [ath5k-devel] [PATCH/RFC 0/3] ath5k: add driver tracepoints Bruno Randolf
2010-07-20 7:54 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100721011227.GB1999@tux \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).