From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH w-t] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:58:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901115826.GB6547@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283338760.4131.22.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:59:20PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:00 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> > Scan works have now custom workqueue to allow scan functions
> > to run in parallel with other iwlwifi works, which could wait
> > for scan abort finish.
>
> Do we really need a complete workqueue? It seems like the relevant work
> structs that really do need to be waited for from the workqueue can be
> queued with schedule_work?
Custom workqueue is not strictly needed, but it assure all works will
run short after schedule. Common workqueue can not give us such guarantees,
as other driver/subsystem can schedule own work, possibly slow, which
can block start of our work for long time.
> Shouldn't that only be a few of them anyway?
For sure abort_scan and abort_timeout works have to be scheduled on something
other than priv->workqueue. I'm queuing all scan works on priv->scan_workqueue
for consistency.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 15:00 [PATCH w-t] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 10:59 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 11:58 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2010-09-01 12:41 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 14:16 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 14:26 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 15:24 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 16:04 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 8:47 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 9:21 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 10:52 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 12:52 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 14:16 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 14:24 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 9:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 11:07 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 11:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 11:42 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 10:17 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901115826.GB6547@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).