From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31170 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752636Ab0IIQGa (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:06:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:06:47 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: "Guy, Wey-Yi W" Cc: Johannes Berg , "Chatre, Reinette" , "John W. Linville" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v2] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Message-ID: <20100909160646.GB376@redhat.com> References: <1284040354-31703-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <20100909155522.GA376@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:57:10AM -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi W wrote: > > Do we have any bugzilla bug# can associated to this set of patches? > > Yes, I'm doing this for RHEL6 bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593566 > > I'm pretty sure there are lot's of other "WARNING: at > net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work" bug reports, which will > be most likely fixed by this patchset. > > > Could these bug# be part of description which can help us keep track of the bugs status Sure. But you mean patch 0 description ? That text does not go to changelog, but at least is keep on mailing list archives ... Stanislaw