From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:39490 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755277Ab0IVP3r (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:29:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:15:57 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH wireless-2.6] iwlwifi: do not perferm force reset while doing scan] Message-ID: <20100922151557.GE5515@tuxdriver.com> References: <1285166620.12056.29.camel@wwguy-huron> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1285166620.12056.29.camel@wwguy-huron> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:43:40AM -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote: > The "iwlwifi: do not perferm force reset while doing scan" patch, make > sense for .36, but after Gruszka's scan patch(which will in .37), it is > not needed. What is your recommendation? > > > commit#7acc7c683a747689aaaaad4fce1683fc3f85e552 iwlwifi: do not perferm > force reset while doing scan I can pull wireless-2.6 into wireless-next-2.6 and then revert the patch there. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.