From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:39762 "EHLO
	smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753317Ab0IYNoU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:44:20 -0400
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:43:25 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rebased version of wireless-testing?
Message-ID: <20100925134325.GD1948@tuxdriver.com>
References: <4C9CFD86.2080207@candelatech.com>
 <20100924200532.GH8077@tuxdriver.com>
 <4C9D14B6.70206@candelatech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
In-Reply-To: <4C9D14B6.70206@candelatech.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:14:30PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:

> >You will be better-off pulling wireless-next-2.6 (and maybe
> >wireless-2.6 as well).  The history there isn't always immutable
> >(although I prefer it to be), but it will tend to be a lot cleaner
> >than wireless-testing.
> 
> Any chance you could push tags in wireless-next-2.6?

Not sure what you mean -- are you not seeing the master-<date> tags?

John
-- 
John W. Linville                Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com                  might be all we have.  Be ready.