From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:60267 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753136Ab0I0POh (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:02:35 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Ben Greear Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: rebased version of wireless-testing? Message-ID: <20100927150235.GB11086@tuxdriver.com> References: <4C9CFD86.2080207@candelatech.com> <20100924200532.GH8077@tuxdriver.com> <4C9D14B6.70206@candelatech.com> <20100925134325.GD1948@tuxdriver.com> <4C9E1C5D.4020805@candelatech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4C9E1C5D.4020805@candelatech.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 08:59:25AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > On 09/25/2010 06:43 AM, John W. Linville wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:14:30PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > > >>>You will be better-off pulling wireless-next-2.6 (and maybe > >>>wireless-2.6 as well). The history there isn't always immutable > >>>(although I prefer it to be), but it will tend to be a lot cleaner > >>>than wireless-testing. > >> > >>Any chance you could push tags in wireless-next-2.6? > > > >Not sure what you mean -- are you not seeing the master- tags? > > It didn't seem like the 2.6.36-rcX tags were there..but then again, maybe > I'm looking for something that doesn't exist? Ah...well, they probably won't be in there until after 2.6.36 is released. I generally don't pull from Linus into that tree during the release cycle in order to avoid surprising Dave when he pulls it. But if you are basing on linux-2.6 then you should already have those tags anyway? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.