From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] iwlwifi: schedule to deprecate software scan support
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:04:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101007180421.GC20950@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286440790.3657.28.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:39:50AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:03 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > > The current HW scan implementation was improve a lot and sw scan will
> > > cause problem, especially once we introduce P2P.
> >
> > What support issues are caused by supporting software scanning?
> >
> > Whatever issues are caused by scanning with P2P, doesn't mac80211
> > have to handle them anyway?
>
> Technically, yes, but there are some things it doesn't handle today, and
> there are some things in mac80211's scan implementation that
> unfortunately make our firmware somewhat unhappy. Also, when we have two
> virtual interfaces (for p2p) the firmware can get completely confused by
> a software scan, especially when we were operating as a p2p-GO.
>
> But isn't this the wrong way around -- shouldn't you be arguing why it
> should be kept and dig out bug reports about the HW scan implementation
> that weren't addressed? ;-)
Hmmm...not so sure about that. Alan Cox has been quoted as saying
"a maintainer's job is to say no".
I suppose we can argue about this again when you actually try to
remove the option...
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-06 15:23 [PATCH 0/6] update for 2.6.37 Wey-Yi Guy
2010-10-06 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] iwlwifi: schedule to deprecate software scan support Wey-Yi Guy
2010-10-06 17:36 ` John W. Linville
2010-10-06 17:48 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-06 17:51 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-06 19:03 ` John W. Linville
2010-10-06 19:43 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-07 8:39 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-07 18:04 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2010-10-07 18:31 ` [ipw3945-devel] " Daniel Halperin
2010-10-07 18:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-06 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] iwlagn: reduce redundant parameter definitions Wey-Yi Guy
2010-10-06 15:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] iwlagn: rename iwl5000_tx_power_dbm_cmd Wey-Yi Guy
2010-10-06 15:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] iwlwifi: remove uncorrect comments Wey-Yi Guy
2010-10-06 15:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] iwlagn: rename iwl5000_tx_resp Wey-Yi Guy
2010-10-06 15:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] iwlagn: define 130 series of WiFi/BT combo devices Wey-Yi Guy
2010-10-06 23:28 ` Julian Calaby
2010-10-06 23:32 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101007180421.GC20950@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).