From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
To: "linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: How to profile this strange effect under high load?
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:33:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010121933.59209.br1@einfach.org> (raw)
Hello!
I am trying to debug a strange effect, I am seeing on soekris net48xx boards
with two ath5k interfaces:
* wlan0 [phy0] configured in ad-hoc mode, A band, and it is getting a lot of
traffic routed thru it
* wlan1 [phy1] also configured in ad-hoc mode, G band, but not actively
sending (no IP address).
I run iperf between two PCs attached by ethernet, UDP 25Mbps and I am sure all
traffic is routed thru wlan0 (phy0). The load on the SENDING box gets very
high:
Mem: 27304K used, 99040K free, 0K shrd, 616K buff, 14128K cached
CPU: 0% usr 0% sys 0% nic 0% idle 0% io 5% irq 93% sirq
Load average: 1.73 1.01 2.23 2/38 3128
PID PPID USER STAT VSZ %MEM %CPU COMMAND
2772 2 root RW 0 0% 71% [phy1]
2757 2 root SW 0 0% 11% [phy0]
3128 436 root R 988 1% 8% top
3 2 root SW 0 0% 5% [ksoftirqd/0]
5 2 root SW 0 0% 3% [events/0]
56 2 root SW 0 0% 1% [bdi-default]
1383 1 root S 1824 1% 0% /usr/bin/oprofiled --session-dir=/r
...and the interesting thing is that [phy1] - the INACTIVE interface -
consumes much more CPU time than [phy0] which is actually transmitting.
I have disabled ANI on wlan1, to avoid getting many MIB interrupts, but it
does not change much.
I have dumped frames on phy1, and all it sees are a few beacon frames.
I have tried wlan1 in managed mode - same effect. The effect is slightly less
in AP mode, though...
I tried oprofile, but it shows mostly tx related things.
So my question is: How can I find out, what [phy1] is so busy doing? Any ideas
how to profile this?
Thanks in advance,
bruno
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 10:33 Bruno Randolf [this message]
2010-10-12 17:14 ` [ath5k-devel] How to profile this strange effect under high load? Qasim Javed
2010-10-14 7:49 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-10-12 17:15 ` Bob Copeland
2010-10-12 18:22 ` Nick Kossifidis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010121933.59209.br1@einfach.org \
--to=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).