From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34513 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751583Ab0JUHya (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:54:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20101021.005453.193707125.davem@davemloft.net> To: padovan@profusion.mobi Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, marcel@holtmann.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth-2.6 2010-10-18 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20101018190208.GA3080@vigoh> References: <20101018055540.GA13511@vigoh> <20101018200830.GA2443@tuxdriver.com> <20101018190208.GA3080@vigoh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:02:09 -0200 > * John W. Linville [2010-10-18 16:08:31 -0400]: > >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:55:40AM -0200, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote: >> > Hi John, >> > >> > Not sure if we still have time for a last minute fix, but here goes a >> > fix for a NULL dereference in L2CAP layer for 2.6.36-rc8. Please also let >> > me know if this is the right way to handle such last minute fix. Maybe you >> > should want this directly through Dave. >> > >> > Thanks. >> >> The fix seems fine to me. Given the short schedule, it might be best >> to skip the middleman and have Dave pull directly from you? >> >> Dave, be forewarned that Gustavo has based his tree off 2.6.36-rc8 -- >> dunno if you are ready to pull that into net-2.6 or not. > > If you guys think that rebase against Linus' tree could be a problem, I > can start to base bluetooth-2.6 against net-2.6 for the next pull > requests. I've now pulled this.