From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:46815 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756470Ab0JZKEr (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:04:47 -0400 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so3201480bwz.19 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:04:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Helmut Schaa To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: Question about starting up an AP Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:04:01 +0200 Cc: Ivo van Doorn , Joshua Smith , "linux-wireless" , users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com References: <201010261135.31232.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> <1288086094.3761.6.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1288086094.3761.6.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <201010261204.01481.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Dienstag 26 Oktober 2010 schrieb Johannes Berg: > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:35 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: > > > > I'll let Ivo decide on this. At least if we really want to wait more then one > > > second for DMA to be ready we should increase the msleep(1) to msleep(10) and > > > keep the maximum number of retries at 100. > > > Ivo, do we want to add the excessive waiting (up to one second) for DMA on > > rt2800 as it fixes Joshuas device? At the moment we're waiting 100ms. > > I don't usually chime in on other drivers but is there any reason not > to? Properly functioning devices obviously reply within 100ms, so they > wouldn't change behaviour, hopefully broken ones that _never_ work are > rare, and the remaining ones like Joshua's would be fixed ... True, nevertheless I wanted to get Ivos ack before going ahead. Helmut